A comprehensive investigation of the partitioning and hydrogen bonding behavior of indole containing derivatives of 1,3,4-thiadiazole and 1,2,4-triazole by means of experimental and calculative approaches

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 482-489

  Tsantili Kakoulidou, Anna ^a   Varvaresou, Athanasia ^a   Siatra Papastaikoudi, Theodora ^a   Raevsky, Oleg A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

High performance liquid chromatography; Hydrogen bond donor and acceptor factor; Partition coefficients

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXATION; CYCLOHEXANE; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;

BONDING BEHAVIOR; DONOR AND ACCEPTOR; HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROGEN BOND ACCEPTORS; HYDROGEN BOND DONOR AND ACCEPTOR FACTOR; HYDROGEN BOND DONORS; LIPOPHILICITY; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; THIADIAZOLES; WATER PARTITION COEFFICIENTS;

HYDROGEN BONDS;

1,2,4 TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVE; 1,3,4 THIADIAZOLE DERIVATIVE; CYCLOHEXANE; INDOLE; OCTANOL; WATER;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROGEN BOND; LIPOPHILICITY; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0032745870     PISSN: 09318771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3838(199911)18:5<482::AID-QSAR482>3.0.CO;2-R     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. van de Waterbeemd, H. and Testa, B., The parametrization of lipophilicity and other structural properties in drug design, in: Testa B. (Ed.), Advances in Drug Research Vol. 16, Academic Press, New York, 1987, pp. 85-227.
2. Hansch, C., The physicochemical approach to drug design and discovery (QSAR), Drug. Dev. Res. 1, 267-309 (1981).
3. oct from Structures, Chem. Rev. 93, 1281-1993 (1993).
4. Rekker, R.F. and Mannhold, R., 'Calculation of Drug Lipophilicity', VCH, Weinheim, 1992.
5. Mannhold, R. and Rekker, R.F., The lipophilic behavior of organic compounds: 1. An updating of the hydrophobic fragmental constant, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 17, 517-536, 1998.
6. Ghose, A.K. and Crippen, G.M., Atomic physicochemical parameters for three-dimensional structure-directed quantitative structure-activity relationships I. Partition coefficients as a measure of hydrophobicity, J. Comput. Chem. 7, 565-577 (1986).
7. Broto, P., Moreau, G. and Vandycke, C., Molecular structures, perception, autocorrelation descriptor and SAR studies; System of atomic contribution for the calculation of the octanol-water partition coefficient, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 19,71-18 (1984).
8. Suzuki, T. and Kudo, Y., Automatic logP estimation based on combined additive modeling methods, J. Comp.-Aided Mol. Des. 4, 155-198 (1990).
9. Raevsky, O.A., SLIPPER-A New program for water solubility, lipophilicity and permeability prediction, in: K. Gundertofte (Ed.), Molecular Modelling and Prediction of Bioactivity, 1999, London. Plenum Press (in press).
10. Meylan, W.M. and Howard, P.H., Atom/Fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coeficients, J. Pharm. Sci. 84, 83-92 (1995).
11. Leo, A., Hansch, C. and Elkins, D., Partition coefficients and their uses, Chem. Rev. 71, 525-616 (1973).
12. Hersey, A., Hill, A.P., Hyde, R.M. and Livingstone, J., Principles of method selection in partition studies, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 8, 288-296 (1989).
13. Kaliszan, R., High Performance liquid chromatographic methods and procedures of hydrophobicity determination, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 9, 83-87 (1990).
14. Bechalany, A., Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A., El Tayar, N. and Testa, B., Measurement of lipophilicity indices by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography: comparison of two stationary phases and various eluents, J. Chromatogr. 541, 221-229 (1991).
15. M-corrections; Interrelations with partition coefficients, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 11, 36-44 (1992).
16. oct values, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 17, 549-557 (1998).
17. Panderi, I., Angelopoulos, Ch., Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A., Kazanis, M. and Vavayannis, A., Lipophilicity studies on β-blocker benzoxazinone derivatives, Il Farmaco 52, 167-172 (1997).
18. Mannhold, R. and Dross K., Calculation procedures for molecular lipophilicity: a comparative study, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 15, 403-409 (1996).
19. Yang, G.Z., Lien, E.J. and Guo, R., Physical factors contributing to hydrophobic constant π, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 5, 12-(1986).
20. Abraham, M.H., Scales of solute hydrogen-bonding: Their construction and application to physicochemical and biochemical processes, Chem. Rev. 22, 73-83 (1993).
21. Testa, B., Carrupt, P.-A., Gaillard, P. and Tsai, R.-S., Intramolecular interactions encoded in lipophilicity: Their nature and significance, in: Pliska V., Testa B., van de Waterbeemd H. (Eds.), Lipophilicity in Drug Action and Toxicology, VCH, Weinheim, 1996, pp. 49-71.
22. Raevsky, O. A., Schaper, K.-J. and Seydel, J.K., H-Bond contribution to octanol-water partition coefficients of polar compounds, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 14, 433-436 (1995).
23. Altomare, C., Cellamare, S., Carotti, A., Casini, G., Ferappi, M., Gavuzzo, E., Mazza, F., Carrupt P-A., Gaillard, P. and Testa, B., X-ray crystal structure, partitioning behavior and molecular modeling study of Piracetam-type nootropics: Insight into the pharmacophore, J. Med. Chem. 38, 170-179 (1995).
24. Carrupt, P.-A., Gaillard, P., Billois, F., Webwe, P., Testa, B., Meyer, C. and Perez, S., The molecular lipophilicity potential (MLP): A new tool for logP calculations and docking and in Comparative Molecular Field Analysis, in: Pliska, V., Testa, B., van de Waterbeemd, H. (Eds.), Lipophilicity in Drug Action and Toxicology, VCH, Weinheim, 1996, pp.195-217.
25. Seiler, P., Interconversion of lipophilicity from hydrocarbon-water systems into the octanol-water systems, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 9, 473-479 (1974).
26. El Tayar, N., Testa, B. and Carrupt, P.-A., Polar intermolecular interactions encoded in partition coefficients: an indirect estimation of hydrogen-bond parameters of poly-functional solutes, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 1455-1459 (1992).
27. Taft, R., Berthelot, M., Laurence, C. and Leo, A., Hydrogen bonds and molecular structure, CHEMTECH, 20-29, July (1996).
28. 2-receptor histamine antagonists, J. Med. Chem. 31, 656-671 (1988).
29. 1-antihistaminic agents in relation to their central sedative side-effects, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2, 373-384 (1994).
30. Raevsky, O.A. and Schaper, K-J. Quantitative estimation of hydrogen bond contribution to permeability and absorption processes of some chemicals and drugs, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 33, 799-807 (1998).
31. Tsotinis, A., Varvaresou, A., Calogeropoulou Th., Siatra-Papastaikoudi, Th. and Tiligada, A., Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of indole containing derivatives of 1,3,4-thiadiazole, 1,2,4 triazole and their open-chain counterparts, Arzneim. Forsch. 47, 307-310 (1997).
32. Varvaresou, A., Siatra-Papastaikoudi, Th., Tsotinis, A., Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A. and Vamvakides A., Synthesis, lipophilicity and biological evaluation of indole containing derivatives of 1,3,4-Thiadiazole and 1,2,4-Triazole, lI Farmaco, 53, 320-326 (1998).
33. Raevsky, O.A., Program Package HYBOT (HYdrogen Bond Thermodynamics), Newsletter of QSAR and Modeling Society, 7, 16 (1996).
34. Miller, K.J., Additivity methods in molecular polarizability, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 8533-8538 (1990).
35. Hansch, C, Leo, A. and Hoekman, D., In: Exploring QSAR Hydrophobic, Electronic and Steric Constants, ACS Professional Reference Book, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1995.
36. Guardado, P., Balon, M., Carmona, C., Munoz, M. and Domene, C., Partition coefficients of indoles and betacarbolines, J. Pharm. Sci. 86, 106-109 (1997).
37. Newer calculations with the latest version of ClogP, v.4.0 give improved lipophilicity predictions for all compounds leading to the following values: 1a = 2.71, 1b = 3.21, 1c = 3.88, 1d = 4.78, 1e = 2.54, 1f = 3.04, 2a = 2.94, 2b = 3.48, 2c = 4.11, 3a = 2.99, 3b = 3.26, 4a = 3.22, 4c = 4.39. Except for the 2-series the agreement with the measured values is acceptable.
38. Raevsky, O.A., Hydrogen bond strength estimation by means of HYBOT. in: van de Waterbeemd, H. Testa, B., Folkers, G. (Eds.), Computer Assisted Lead Finding and Optimization; Current tools for Medicinal Chemistry, Wiley-VCH Weinheim, 1997, pp. 369-378.