Removal of dissolved organic compounds from paper machine whitewater by membrane bioreactors: A comparative analysis

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 1085-1099

  Tenno, R ^a   Paulapuro, H ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Biotechnology; Modelling; Papermaking; Simulation

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; FILTRATION; MEMBRANE REACTOR;

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PURIFICATION; WASTE PAPER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

DISSOLVED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (DCD); PAPER MACHINE WHITEWATER;

PAPERMAKING MACHINERY;

BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE; ORGANIC COMPOUND; PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY; REMOVAL;

EID: 0032745573     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0661(99)00079-9     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alexander S.D., Dobbins R.J. The buildup of dissolved electrolytes in a closed paper mill system. Journal of TAPPI. 60(12):1977;117-124.
2. Åstrom K.J. Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory. 1970;301 Academic Press, New York.
3. Bailey A.D., Hansford G.S., Dold P.L. The use of crossflow microfiltration to enhance the performance of an activated sludge reactor. Journal of Water Research. 28(2):1994;297-301.
4. Barnett D.J., Grier L. Mill closure forces focus on fines retention, foam control. Journal of Pulp and Paper. 70(4):1996;89-95.
5. Brockmann, M., Seyfried, C.F. (1996). Sludge activity and crossflow-microfiltration - a non-beneficial relationship. Proceedings of 18th IAWQ Biennial International Conference on Water Quality, 5, Singapore (pp. 363-370).
6. Cronin W.R. Effluent closure forces close look at liquid/solid separation issues. Journal of Pulp and Paper. 70(6):1996;59-64.
7. Diedrich, K., Hamm, U., Knelissen, J.H. (1997). Biologische kreislaufwasserbehandlung in einer papier-fabrik mit geschlossenem wasserkreislauf. Proceedings of 26th EUCEPA conference on the sustainable paper cycle - a challenge. Baden-Baden (pp. V153-V158).
8. Elefsiniotis, P., Hall, E. R., Johnson, R. M. (1995). Contaminant removal from recalculated white water by ultrafiltration and/or biological treatment. TAPPI Proceedings of on international environmental conference (pp. 861-867).
9. Farlow M. Water management critical for mills making effort at whitewater closure. Journal of Pulp and Paper. 70(5):1996;93-99.
10. Gudlauski D.G. Whitewater system closure means managing microbiological buildup. Journal of Pulp and Paper. 70(3):1996;161-165.
11. Henze, M., Gray, C.P.L. Marais, G.V.R., Matsuo, T. (1986). Activated sludge model No 1. Scientific and Technical Reports. IAWPRC Task Group on Mathematical Modelling and Operation of Biological Wastewater Treatment (33 p).
12. Huster R., Demel I., Geller A. Aerobic domestic wastewater treatment in a pilot plant with complete sludge retention by cross-flow filtration. Journal of IAWPRC Water Science and Research. 24(3/4):1991;81-90.
13. Krauth, Kh. (1996). Sustainable sewage treatment plants. Proceedings of 18th IAWQ biennial international conference on water quality. vol 3, Singapore (pp. 254-261).
14. Krauth Kh.R., Staab K.F. Pressurized bioreactor with membrane filtration for wastewater treatment. Journal of Water Research. 27(3):1993;405-411.
15. Lubbecke S., Vogelpohl A., Dewjanin W. Wastewater treatment in a biological high-performance system with high biomass concentration. Journal of Water Research. 29(3):1995;793-802.
16. Mallouris M. Consequences of increased clouser level on wet end chemistry. Journal of Pulp and Paper. 70(2):1996;270-275.
17. Minami K., Okamura K., Ogawa S., Naritomi T. Continuous anaerobic treatment of wastewater from kraft pulp mill. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering. 70(4):1991;270-274.
18. Muller E.B., Stouthamer A.H., van Verseveld H.W., Eikelboom D.H. Aerobic domestic waste water treatment in a pilot plant with complete sludge retention by cross-flow filtration. Journal of Water Research. 29(4):1995;1179-1189.
19. Rintala, J. (1992). Thermophilic and Mesophilic anaerobic treatment of pulp and paper industry wastewaters. Tampere University of Technology. Publication No 92 (157 p).
20. Speece R. Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 17(9):1983;416-427.
21. Stephenson R.J., Duff S.J.B. Cogulation and precipitation of a mechanical pulping effluent I. Removal of carbon, colour and turbidity. Journal of Water Research. 30(4):1995;781-797.
22. Tardif, O., Hall, E.R. (1997). Comparison between ultrafiltration and membrane biological reactor treatment for closure of mechanical newsprint mills. Proceedings of TAPPI environmental conference and exhibition. Minneapolis, Book 1 (pp. 315-325).
23. Tenno R., Uronen P. State and parameters estimation for wastewater treatment processes using a stochastic model. Control Engineering Practice. 6(3):1995;793-804.
24. Tenno, R., Subramanian, R. (1999). Accumulation of the dissolved solids in whitewater of reduced discharge paper machine. Journal of Pulp and Paper Science, in press.
25. Ueda, T., Kata, K., Kikuoka, Y. (1996). Treatment of domestic sewage from rural settlements by membrane bioreactors. Proceedings of 18th IAWQ biennial international conference on water quality. Vol 5, Singapore (pp. 347-354).
26. Winnen, H., Suidan, T. M., Scarpino, P. V., Wrenn, B., Urbain, V., Manem, J. (1996). Effectiveness of the membrane bioreactor in the biodegradation of high molecular weight compounds. Proceedings of 18th IAWQ biennial international conference on water quality. Vol 5, Singapore (pp. 355-362).