Recreational damages from reservoir storage level changes

Water Resources Research

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 3489-3494

  Huszar, Eric ^a   Shaw, W Douglass ^a   Englin, Jeffrey ^a   Netusil, Noelwah ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b REED COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTREME EVENT; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; RESERVOIR; WATER LEVEL; WATER MANAGEMENT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032740854     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/1999WR900235     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bishop, R., C. Brown, M. Welsh, K. Boyle, Grand Canyon recreation and Glen Canyon Dam operations: An economic evaluation, in Western Regional Research Project Interim Report, vol. 2, edited by K. Boyle, pp. 407-434, Univ. of Maine, Orono, 1989.
2. Cameron, T. A., W. D. Shaw, S. Ragland, J. M. Callaway, and S. Keefe, Using actual and contingent behavior data with differing levels of aggregation to model recreation demand, J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 21(1), 130-149, 1996.
3. Cooper, J., and J. Loomis, Pooled time-series cross-sectional travel cost models: Testing whether recreation behavior is stable over time, Leisure Sci., 12, 161-171, 1990.
4. Cordell, H. K., and J. C. Bergstrom, Comparison of recreation use values among alternative reservoir water management scenarios, Water Resour. Res., 29, 247-258, 1993.
5. Englin, J., D. Lambert, and W. D. Shaw, A Structural equations approach to modeling consumptive recreation demand, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 33, 33-43, 1997.
6. Fadali, E., and W. D. Shaw, Can recreation values for a lake constitute a market for banked agricultural water?, Contemp. Econ. Policy, XVI(October), 433-441, 1998.
7. Hellerstein, D., Using count data models in travel cost with aggregate data, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 73(3), 860-866, 1991.
8. Hellerstein, D., Intertemporal data and travel cost analysis, Environ. Resour. Econ., 3(2), 193-204, 1993.
9. Jakus, P., P. Dowell, and M. Murray, The effect of fluctuating water levels on reservoir fishing, discussion paper, Dep. of Agric. Econ., Univ. of Tenn., Knoxville, 1999.
10. Loomis, J. B., Measuring the economic benefits of removing dams and restoring the Elwha River: Results of a contingent valuation survey, Water Resour. Res., 332, 441-447, 1996.
11. Loomis, J., and M. Creel, Recreation benefits of increased flows in California's San Joaquin and Stanislaus Rivers, Rivers, 3, 13-20, 1992.
12. McKean, J. R., D. M. Johnson, and R. G. Walsh, Valuing time in travel cost demand analysis: An empirical investigation, Land Econ., 71, 96-105, 1995.
13. Morey, E., and D. Waldman, Measurement error in recreation demand models: The joint estimation of participation, site choice, and site characteristics, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 35, 262-276, 1998.
14. National Audubon Society versus Superior Court of Alpine City, State of Utah, no. 33Cal3d 419, 1983.
15. Nevada Division of Water Resources, Mine pumpage within the Humboldt River Basin, memorandum, Carson City, March 3, 1998.
16. Peterson, G., D. Stynes, and J. R. Arnold, The stability of a recreation demand model over time, J. Leisure Res., 17, 121-132, 1985.
17. Shaw, W. D., and P. Feather, Possibilities for including the opportunity cost of time in recreation demand systems, Land Econ., in press, 1999.
18. Shaw, W. D., and M. T. Ozog, Modeling overnight trip choice: An application of the repeated nested multinomial logit model, Environ. Resour. Econ., 13(4), 397-414, 1999.
19. Shonkwiler, J. S., Recreation demand systems for multiple site count data travel cost models, in Using Revealed Preference Models to Value Recreational Resources, Cambridge: New Horizons Ser. Environ. Econ., edited by J. Herriges and C. Kling, pp. 253-269, E. Elgar, Northampton, Mass., 1999.
20. Shonkwiler, J. S., and W. D. Shaw, Hurdle count data models in recreation demand analysis, J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 21, 210-219, 1996.
21. U.S. Department of the Interior, Final environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact: Rye Patch Dam modification safety of dams program, report, Bur. of Relam. Mid-Pac. Reg., Sacramento, Calif., Oct. 1992.
22. Ward, F., R. Cole, R. Deitner, and K. Green-Hammond, Limiting environmental program contradictions: A demand systems application to fishery management, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 79, 803-813, 1997.
23. White, H., Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models, Econometrica, 50, 1-25, 1982.