Change of perspective in discourse comprehension: Encoding and retrieval processes after brain injury

Brain and Language

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 385-420

  Ferstl, Evelyn C ^a,b   Guthke, Thomas ^a   Von Cramon, D Yves ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; RECALL; SKILL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0032740002     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1999.2151     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alexander M. P., Benson D. F., Stuss D. T. Frontal lobes and language. Brain and Language. 37:1989;656-691.
2. Anderson R. C., Pichert J. W. Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 17:1978;1-12.
3. Axelrod B. N., Goldman R. S., Heaton R. K., Curtiss B., Thompson L. L., Chelune G. J., Kay G. G. Discriminability of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test using the standardization sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 18:1996;338-342.
4. Baillet S. D., Keenan J. M. The role of encoding and retrieval processes in the recall of text. Discourse Processes. 9:1986;247-268.
5. Beeman M., Chiarello C. Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. 1998;Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.
6. Bloom R. L., Obler L. K., De Santi S., Ehrlich J. S. Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations. 1994;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
7. Borland R., Flammer A. Encoding and retrieval processes in memory for prose. Discourse Processes. 8:1985;305-317.
8. Brooks N., McKinlay W., Symington C., Beattie A., Campsie L. Return to work within the first seven years of severe head injury. Brain Injury. 1:1987;5-19.
9. Brookshire R. H., Nicholas L. E. Comprehension of directly and indirectly stated main ideas and details in discourse by brain-damaged an non-brain-damaged listeners. Brain and Language. 21:1984;21-36.
10. Brownell H. H., Gardner H., Prather P., Martino G. Language, communication and the right hemisphere. Kirshner H. S. Handbook of neurological speech and language disorders. 1995;325-350 Dekker, New York.
11. Caplan D. Language: Structure, processing and disorders. 1992;The MIT Press, Cambridge.
12. Chapman S. B., Levin H. S., Culhane K. A. Language impairment in closed head injury. Kirshner H. S. Handbook of neurological speech and language disorders. 1995;387-414 Dekker, New York.
13. Coelho C. A. Discourse production deficits following traumatic brain injury: A critical review of recent literature. Aphasiology. 9:1995;409-429.
14. Coelho C. A., Liles B. Z., Duffy R. J. Analysis of conversational discourse in head-injured adults. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 6:1991;92-98.
15. Coelho C. A., Liles B. Z., Duffy R. J. Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury. 9:1995;471-477.
16. Cohen J. D., Servan-Schreiber D. Context, cortex, and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychological Review. 99:1992;45-77.
17. Daneman M., Carpenter P. A. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 19:1980;450-466.
18. Delis D. C., Kramer J. H., Kaplan E., Obler B. A. The California verbal learning test: Adult version. 1987;The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio.
19. De Renzi E., Faglioni P. Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token Test. Cortex. 14:1978;41-49.
20. De Zubicaray G., Ashton R. Nelson's (1976) Modified Card Sorting Test - A review. Clinical Neuropsychologist. 10:1996;245-254.
21. Duncan J., Emslie H., Williams P., Johnson R., Freer C. Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior. Cognitive Psychology. 30:1996;257-303.
22. Fuster J. M. The prefrontal cortex. Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe. 1988;Raven, New York.
23. Germani M. J., Pierce R. S. Contextual influences in reading comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language. 42:1992;308-319.
24. Glindemann R., von Cramon D. Y. Kommunikationsstörungen bei Patienten mit Frontalhirnläsionen [Communication deficits in patients with frontal lobe lesions]. Sprache, Stimme, Gehör. 19:1995;1-7.
25. Goldberg T. E., Saint-Cyr J. A., Weinberger D. R. Assessment of procedural learning and problem solving in schizophrenic patients by Tower of Hanoi type tasks. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2:1990;165-173.
26. Hartley L. L., Levin H. S. Linguistic deficits after closed head injury: A current appraisal. Aphasiology. 4:1990;353-370.
27. Haut M. W., Petros T. V., Frank R. G. The recall of prose as a function of importance following closed head injury. Brain Injury. 4:1990;281-288.
28. Hess T. M., Flannagan D. A. Schema-based retrieval processes in young and older adults. Journals of Gerontology. 47:1992;52-58.
29. Horn W. Leistungsprüfsystem (LPS) [Performance assessment system]. 1983;Verlag für Psychologie, Göttingen.
30. Hough M. S. Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain-damage: Theme organization. Brain and Language. 38:1990;253-277.
31. Huber W., Poeck K., Willmes K. The Aachen Aphasia Test. Rose F. C. Advances in Neurology. 1984;Raven Press, New York.
32. Joanette Y., Brownell H. H. Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. 1990;Springer, New York.
33. Johnson-Laird P. N. Mental models. 1983;Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
34. Kaczmarek B. L. J. Neurolinguistic analysis of verbal utterances in patients with focal lesions of frontal lobes. Brain and Language. 21:1984;52-58.
35. Kaczmarek B. L. J. Regulatory function of the frontal lobes: A neurolinguistic perspective. Perecman E. The frontal lobes revisited. 1987;225-240 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
36. Kardash C. A., Royer J. M., Greene B. A. Effects of schemata on both encoding and retrieval of information from prose. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80:1988;324-329.
37. Kimberg D. Y., Farah M. J. A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: The role of working memory in complex, organized behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 122:1993;411-428.
38. Kintsch W. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review. 95:1988;163-182.
39. Kintsch W., van Dijk T. A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review. 85:1978;363-394.
40. Kintsch W., Welsch D., Schmalhofer F., Zimny S. Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language. 29:1990;133-159.
41. Kirshner H. S. Handbook of neurological speech and language disorders. 1995;Dekker, New York.
42. Lee-Sammons W. H., Whitney P. Reading perspectives and memory for text: An individual differences analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 17:1991;1074-1081.
43. Mattson A. J., Levin H. S. Frontal lobe dysfunction following closed head injury. A review of the literature. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 178:1990;282-291.
44. McDonald S. Viewing the brain sideways? Frontal versus right hemisphere explanations of non-aphasic language disorders. Aphasiology. 7:1993;535-549.
45. Nelson H. E. A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex. 12:1976;313-324.
46. Newsome G. L. The effects of reader perspective and cognitive style on remembering important information from texts. Journal of Reading Behavior. 18:1986;117-133.
47. Nicholas L. E., Brookshire R. H. Comprehension of spoken narrative discourse by adults with aphasia, right-hemisphere brain damage, or traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 4:1995;69-81.
48. Novoa O. P., Ardila A. Linguistic abilities in patients with pre-frontal damage. Brain and Language. 30:1987;206-225.
49. Pichert J. W., Anderson R. C. Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology. 69:1977;309-315.
50. Pierce R. S. Influence of prior and subsequent context on comprehension in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2:1988;577-582.
51. Prigatano G. P., Roueche J. R., Fordyce D. J. Nonaphasic language disturbances after brain injury. Prigatano G. P., Fordyce D. J., Zeiner H. K., Roueche J. R., Pepping M., Wood B. C. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. 1986;John Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.
52. Saint-Cyr J. A., Taylor A. E., Lang A. E. Procedural learning and neostriatal dysfunction in man. Brain. 11:1988;941-959.
53. Snow P., Douglas J., Ponsford J. Conversational assessment following traumatic brain injury: A comparison across two control groups. Brain Injury. 11:1997a;409-429.
54. Snow P., Douglas J., Ponsford J. Procedural discourse following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 11:1997b;947-967.
55. Stachowiak F.-J., Huber W., Poeck K., Kerschensteiner M. Text comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language. 4:1977;177-195.
56. Stemmer B., Joanette Y. The interpretation of narrative discourse of brain-damaged individuals within the framework of a multilevel discourse model. Beeman M., Chiarello C. Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. 1998;329-348 Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.
57. Stuss D. T., Benson D. F. The frontal lobes. 1986;Raven Press, New York.
58. Stuss D. T., Benson D. F. The frontal lobes and control of cognition and memory. Perecman E. The frontal lobes revisited. 1987;141-158 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
59. Ulatowska H. K., Chapman S. B. Macrostructure in aphasia. Bloom R. L., Obler L. K., De Santi S., Ehrlich J. S. Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations. 1994;29-46 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
60. van Dijk T. A., Kintsch W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. 1983;Academic Press, New York.
61. Wallesch C. W., Kornhuber H. H., Köllner C., Haas H. C., Hufnagl J. M. Language and cognitive deficits resulting from medial and dorsolateral frontal lobe lesions. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten. 233:1983;279-296.
62. Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale - revised. 1987;Psychological Corporation, New York.
63. Wilson B., Alderman N., Burgess P. W., Emslie H., Evans J. J. Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. 1996;Thames Valley Test Company, Bury.
64. Zimmermann P., Fimm B. Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP) [Test battery for the assessment of attention]. 1992;Psychologische Testsysteme, Würselen.