Latent model for correlated binary data with diagnostic error

Biometrics

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 1232-1235

  Shih, Joanna H ^a   Albert, Paul S ^b  

^a NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlation; Diagnostic error; Latent model; Misclassification; Random effects

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

AD HOC APPROACH; BINARY DATA; CORRELATION; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; LATENT MODELS; MISCLASSIFICATIONS; PERFORMANCE; RANDOM EFFECTS; TRUE POSITIVE;

DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DATA ANALYSIS; ERROR; HUMAN; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA;

EID: 0032739325     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.01232.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (1965). Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover.
2. Aptech Systems. (1992). GAUSS System, Version 3.0. Kent, Washington: Aptech Systems.
3. Hui, S. and Walter, S. D. (1980). Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 36, 167-171.
4. McCulloch, C. E. (1997). Maximum likelihood algorithms for generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, 162-170.
5. Qu, Y., Tan, M., and Kutner, M. H. (1996). Random effects models in latent class analysis for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 52, 797-810.
6. Stiratelli, R., Laird, N., and Ware, J. H. (1984). Random effects models for serial observations with binary responses. Biometrics 40, 961-971.
7. Vacek, P. M. (1985). The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 41, 959-968.
8. Yang, I. and Becker, M. P. (1997). Latent variable modeling of diagnostic accuracy. Biometrics 53, 948-958.