Gd-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of breast masses

Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 143-151

  Ikeda, Osamu ^a   Yamashita, Yasuyuki ^a   Takahashi, Mutsumasa ^a  

^a KUMAMOTO UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Angiogenesis; Breast cancer; Pharmacokinetic analysis

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ANGIOGENESIS; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032737910     PISSN: 08993459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002142-199904000-00007     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Sylvia H, Heywang-Koebrunner SH, Thomas H. The breast. In: Magnetic resonance imaging of the body, 3rd edition. New York: Lippincott-Raven Press, 1997;379-408.
2. Bridges AJ, Vasey FB. Silicone breast implants: History, safety, and potential complications. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2638-44.
3. Letterman G, Schurter M. History of aesthetic breast surgery. In: Lewis JR, ed. The art of aesthetic plastic surgery, vol 1. Boston: Little, Brown, 1989;21-7.
4. Greenstein Orel S, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlations. Radiology 1994;190:485-93.
5. Peters PHM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, et al. Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen: report of six screening rounds, 1975-1986. Int J Cancer 1989;43:226-30.
6. Jackson V. The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 1990;177: 305-11.
7. Harms SE, Flaming DP, Hesly KL, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional MR imaging of the breast. RadioGraphics 1993;13: 247-67.
8. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989;171:95-103.
9. Fornage BD, Toubas O, Morel M. Clinical, mammographic and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size. Cancer 1987;60:765-71.
10. Harms SE, Flaming DP, Hesley KL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Magn Reson Q 1992;8:139-55.
11. Harms SE, Flaming DP, Hesly KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast without rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;187:493-501.
12. Holland R, Veling SHJ, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of T1-2 breast carcinomas. Cancer 1985;56:979-90.
13. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Oellinger H. Breast: Magnevist monograph. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994;79-84.
14. Nunes LW, Orel SG, Schnall MD. Diagnostic accuracy and lesion characteristic predictive values in the MR imaging evaluation of breast masses [Abstract]. Radiology 1994;193(P):853.
15. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, et al. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994;190:485-93.
16. Rubens D, Totterman S, Chacko AK, et al. Gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast. AJR 1991; 157:267-70.
17. Kawasima H. Fat suppressed dynamic MR imaging of breast cancer: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Nippon ACTA Radiol 1996;56: 459-69.
18. Harms SE, Flaming DP, Hesly KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of the examination off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187:493-501.
19. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Beck R, Lommatzsch B, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast; survey of 1200 patient examinations [Abstract]. Radiology 1992;185(P):246.
20. Kaiser WA, Reiser M. False positive cases in dynamic MR mammography [Abstract]. Radiology 1992;185(P):245.
21. Kaiser WA, Reiser M. Multifocality of breast cancer detected with dynamic MR mammography [Abstract]. Radiology 1992;185(P):245.
22. David LB, Philip JD, Strarrous M. Microvessel density in invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:461-64.
23. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989;171:95-103.
24. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989;170:681-86.
25. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995;197:33-8.
26. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turbo FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994;193:777-81.
27. Gilles R, Guinebretiere J, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994;191:625-31.
28. Sewell CW. Pathology of benign and malignant breast disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 1995;33:1067-9.
29. Jacques AB, Ruud KKMH, Jouke S, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of Gd-DTPA enhancement in dynamic three-dimensional MRI of breast lesions. JMRM 1997;7:702-15.
30. Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:357-67.
31. Kirsten L, Weind BSc, Cynthia F, et al. Invasive carcinomas and fibroadenomas of breast: comparison of microvessel distributions-implications for imaging modalities. Radiology 1998;208:477-83.
32. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, et al. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1-8.