Morbidity of flank incision for renal donors

Urology

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 796-801

  Duque, Jose Luis F ^a   Loughlin, Kevin R ^a   Kumar, Sanjaya ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; ORGAN DONOR; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF ESTEEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; CICATRIX; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 0032729397     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00274-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Weinstein S.H., Navarre R.J. Jr, Loening S.A., et al. Experience with live donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 124:1980;321-323.
2. DeMarco T., Amin M., Harty J.I. Living donor nephrectomy factors influencing morbidity . J Urol. 127:1982;1082-1083.
3. Riehle R.A. Jr, Steckler R., Naslund E.B., et al. Selection criteria for the evaluation of living related renal donors. J Urol. 144:1990;845-848.
4. Waples M.J., Belzer F.O., Uehling D.T. Living donor nephrectomy a 20 year experience . Urology. 45:1994;207-210.
5. Lowell J.A., Taylor R.J. The evaluation of the living renal donor, surgical techniques and results. Semin Urol. 12:1994;102-107.
6. Ottelin M.C., Bueschen A.J., Lloyd L.K., et al. Review of 333 living donor nephrectomies. South Med J. 87:1994;61-64.
7. Blohme I., Fehrman I., Norden G. Living donor nephrectomy. Complication rates in 490 consecutive cases. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 26:1992;149-153.
8. Shaffer D., Sahyoun A.I., Madras P.N., et al. Two hundred one consecutive living donor nephrectomies. Arch Surg. 133:1998;426-431.
9. 1995 Annual Report of the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network - Transplant Data: 1988-1994. UNOS, Richmond, Virginia and the Division of Transplantation, Bureau of Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland, 1995.
10. Ratner L.E., Ciseck L.J., Moore R.G., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 60:1995;1047-1049.
11. Ratner L.E., Kavoussi L.R., Sroka M., et al. Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy - a comparison with the open approach. Transplantation. 63:1997;229-233.
12. Jacobs S.C., Cho E., Orth C.R., et al. Complications of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 157:1997;429. (abstract).
13. Ratner L.E., Kavoussi L.R., Schulam P.G., et al. Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc. 29:1997;138-139.
14. Flowers J.L., Jacobs S., Cho E., et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 226:1997;483-490.
15. Langley G.B., Sheppeard H. The visual analogue scale its use in pain measurement . Rheumatol Int. 5:1985;145-148.
16. Collins S.L., Moore R.A., McQuay H.J. The visual analogue pain intensity scale what is moderate pain in millimeters? Pain. 72:1997;95-97.
17. Wolf J.S. Jr, Stoller M.L. The physiology of laparoscopy basic principles, complications and other considerations . J Urol. 152:1994;294-302.
18. Barry J.M. Renal transplantation. Walsh P.C., Retik A.B., Stamey T.A., et al. Campbell's Urology. 6th ed. 1992;2501-2520 WB Saunders, Philadelphia.
19. Philosophe B, Kuo P, Schweitzer EJ, et al: Laparoscopic vs. open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications and improving the laparoscopic technique. Presented at the Transplantation Society, XVII World Congress, Montreal, Canada, July 1998.
20. Ratner L.E., Bishoff J.T., Montgomery R.A., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy long term results (abstract) . J Urol. 159:1998;182.
21. Suzuki K., Ushiyama T., Ishikawa A., et al. Retroperitoneoscopy assisted live donor nephrectomy the initial 2 cases . J Urol. 158:1997;1353-1356.
22. Ishikawa A., Suzuki K., Saisu K., et al. Endoscopic-assisted live donor nephrectomy comparison between laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic procedures . Transplant Proc. 30:1998;165-167.
23. Wolf J.S. Jr, Tchetgen M.-B., Merion R.M. Hand assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology. 52:1998;885-887.
24. Schover L.R., Streem S.B., Boparai N., et al. The psychosocial impact of donating a kidney long term follow-up from a urology based center . J Urol. 157:1997;1596-1601.