Correspondence amongst microstructure patterns observed in otoacoustic emissions and bekesy audiometry

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 263-266

  Lutman, Mark E ^a   Deeks, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cochlear function; Hearing threshold; Microstructure; Normal hearing; Otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HAIR CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSDUCER;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; HAIR CELLS, OUTER; HUMANS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PERIODICITY;

EID: 0032727071     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206099909073032     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Elliott E. A ripple effect in the audiogram. Nature 1958; 181: 1076
2. Thomas I B. Microstructure of the pure tone threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 1975; 7, Suppl LS26-S27
3. Long G R. The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am, 1980: 68, Suppl 1:S36
4. Long G R. The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds. Hear Res 1984; 15: 73–87
5. Schloth E. Relation between spectral composition of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and fine structure of threshold in quiet. Acustica 1983; 53: 250–6
6. Kemp D T, Chum R. Properties of the generator of the stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear Res 1980; 2: 533–48
7. Long G R, Tubis A. Investigation into the nature of the association between threshold micro-structure and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1988; 36: 125–38
8. Gaskill S A, Brown A M. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product. 2fl-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 821–39
9. He N, Schmiedt J. Fine structure of the 2fl-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2659–69
10. He N, Schmiedt J. Fine structure of 2fl-f2 acoustic distortion product: effect of L1/L2 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3213
11. Talmadge C L. Effects of fine structure on onset behavior of distortion products in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 3161
12. Mills D M. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. I. Two stimulus tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 413–29
13. Zwicker E, Schloth E. Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 75: 1148–54
14. Uppenkamp S, Mauermann M, Kollmeier B. On the relation of distortion and transient evoked emission spectral fine structure. 1997, Personal communication
15. Uppenkamp S, Neumann J. Otoacoustic emissions from normal hearing subjects: some experimental results in connection to psychoacoustics. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids, B, Kollmeier. World Scientific, Singapore 1995; 19–24