Long-term follow-up of a modified Anton-Hartrampf nipple reconstruction

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 467-470

  Banducci, Dennis R ^a   Le, Thinh K ^a   Hughes, Kent C ^a  

^a PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST AREOLA; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; NIPPLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN PIGMENTATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TATTOOING; TISSUE EXPANSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BREAST IMPLANTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; NIPPLES; SURGICAL FLAPS; TISSUE EXPANSION;

EID: 0032726850     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199911000-00001     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Gruber RP. Nipple-areola reconstruction: a review of techniques. Clin Plast Surg 1979;6(1):71-83
2. Kincaid SB. Breast reconstruction: a review. Ann Plast Surg 1984;12(5):431-448
3. Anton M, Eskenazi LB, Hartrampf CR. Nipple reconstruction with local flaps: star and wrap flaps. Perspect Plast Surg 1991;5:67-78
4. Wong RK, Banducci DR, Feldman S, et al. Pre-reconstruction tattooing eliminates the need for skin grafting in nipple areolar reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92(3):547-549
5. Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ, et al. Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99(6):1602-1605