Recognition memory for sentences from spatial descriptions: A test of the episodic construction trace hypothesis

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 962-973

  Baguley, Thom ^a   Payne, Stephen J ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MODEL; RECOGNITION; SPATIAL MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL MEMORY;

EID: 0032725086     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03201227     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. BAGULEY, T. S., & PAYNE, S. J. (1998, August). Given-new versus newgiven? An analysis of reading times for spatial descriptions. Paper presented at Mind III: Spatial Cognition, Dublin, Ireland.
2. BAGULEY, T. S., & PAYNE, S. J. (in press). Long-term memory for spatial and temporal mental models includes construction processes and model structure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
3. BOWER, G. H., & MORROW, D. G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247, 44-48.
4. BRANSFORD, J. D., BARCLAY, J. R., & FRANKS, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193-209.
5. BYRNE, R. M. J., & JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 564-575.
6. CLARK, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76, 387-404.
7. CLARK, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27-63). New York: Academic Press.
8. COVENTRY, K. R., & PRAT-SALA, M. (1998, August). The interplay between geometry and function in the comprehension of spatial prepositions. Paper presented at Mind III: Spatial Cognition, Dublin, Ireland.
9. CROWDER, R. G. (1993). Systems and principles in memory theory: Another critique of pure memory. In A. Collins, M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 139-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. DEWHURST, S. A., & CONWAY, M. A. (1994). Pictures, images, and recollective experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1088-1098.
11. DODSON, C. S., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 125, 181-194.
12. DONALDSON, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 523-533.
13. EHRLICH, K., & JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 21, 296-306.
14. FLETCHER, C. R. (1994). Levels of representation in memory for discourse. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 589-607). San Diego: Academic Press.
15. FLETCHER, C. R., & CHRYSLER, S. T. (1990). Surface forms, textbases and situation models: Recognition memory for three types of textual information. Discourse Processes, 13, 175-190.
16. GARDINER, J. M., & JAVA, R. I. (1991). Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 19, 617-623.
17. GARDINER, J. M., & JAVA, R. I. (1993). Recognising and remembering. In A. Collins, M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 163-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. GARNHAM, A. (1981). Mental models as representations of text Memory & Cognition, 9, 560-565.
19. GARNHAM, A. (1987). Mental models as representations of discourse and text. Chichester, U.K.: Ellis Horwood.
20. GERNSBACHER, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. HUNTER, I. M. L. (1957). The solving of three term series problems. British Journal of Psychology, 48, 286-296.
22. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
23. JACOBY, L. L., TOTH, J. P., & YONELINAS, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
24. JAVA, R. I. (1994). States of awareness following word stem completion. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 77-92.
25. JOHNSON, M. K., & RAYE, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
26. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N., & BYRNE, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
28. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N., BYRNE, R. M. J., & SCHAEKEN, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99, 418-439.
29. KINTSCH, W., WELSCH, D., SCHMALHOFER, F., & ZIMNY, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 133-159.
30. KOLERS, P. A. (1973). Remembering operations. Memory & Cognition, 1, 347-355.
31. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
32. LANGSTON, W., KRAMER, D. C., & GLENBERG, A. M. (1998). The representation of space in mental models derived from text. Memory & Cognition, 26, 247-262.
33. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1984). Some perceptual limitations on talking about space. In A. J. van Doorn, W. A. de Grind, & J. J. Koenderink (Eds.), Limits in perception (pp. 323-358). Utrecht: VNU Science Press.
34. MANI, K., & JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory & Cognition, 10, 181-187.
35. MORRIS, C. D., BRANSFORD, J. D., & FRANKS, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 16, 519-533.
36. PAYNE, S. J. (1993). Memory for mental models of spatial descriptions: An episodic-construction-trace account. Memory & Cognition, 21, 591-603.
37. QUINLAN, P. T. (1992). The Oxford psycholinguistic database. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. RADVANSKY, G. A., SPIELER, D. H., & ZACKS, R. T. (1993). Mental model organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 95-114.
39. RADVANSKY, G. A., & ZACKS, R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 940-953.
40. RADVANSKY, G. A., & ZACKS, R. T. (1997). The retrieval of situation-specific information. In M. A. Conway (Ed.), Cognitive models of memory (pp. 173-213). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
41. ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
42. TAYLOR, H. A., & TVERSKY, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 261-292.
43. TULVING, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 26, 385-398.
44. TVERSKY, B. (1991). Spatial mental models. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 27, pp. 109-145). San Diego: Academic Press.
45. VAN DIJK, T. A., & KINTSCH, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
46. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & DORKEN, M. D. (1993). Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 227-248.
47. WILSON, S. G., RINCK, M., MCNAMARA, T. P., BOWER, G. H., & MORROW, D. G. (1993). Mental models and narrative comprehension: Some qualifications. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 141-154.
48. WRIGHT, R. L., & WHITTLESEA, B. W. A. (1998). Implicit learning of complex structures: Active adaptation and selective processing in acquisition and application. Memory & Cognition, 26, 402-420.
49. ZWAAN, R. A., & RADVANSKY, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.
50. ZWAAN, R. A., & VAN OOSTENDORP, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension? Discourse Processes, 16, 125-143.