Qualitative research methods in otorhinolaryngology

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-10

  Bunne, Marie ^a  

^a Hosp Boden S 961 85 Boden S   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Otorhinolaryngology; Qualitative method; Sound perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EARDRUM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE EAR DISEASE; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSATION; SNIFFING; SOUND RELATED PHENOMENA;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; TYMPANIC MEMBRANE;

EID: 0032723890     PISSN: 01655876     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-5876(99)00248-7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 1994;Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London, New Dehli.
2. Jones R. Why do qualitative research? BMJ. 311:1995;2.
3. Pope C., Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health end health services research. BMJ. 311:1995;42-45.
4. Gilchrist V.J., Engel J.D. Qualitative research in clinical care. J Fam Pract. 41:1995;29-30.
5. Crabtree B.F., Miller W.L. Doing Qualitative Research. 1992;Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
6. Malterud K. Kvalitative Metoder i Medisinsk Forskning (in Norwegian). 1995;Tano Aschehoug, Oslo.
7. Hallberg L.R., Carlsson S.G. Strategies for managing hearing impairment. Br. J. Audiol. 25:1991;201-211.
8. Hallberg L.R., Jansson G. Women with noise-induced hearing-loss: an invisible group? Br. J. Audiol. 30:1996;340-345.
9. Ricoeur P. The model of text: meaningful action considered as a text. Soc. Res. 38:1971;529-562.
10. Giorgi A. Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. Giorgi A. Phenomenology and Psychological Research. 1985;8-22 Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh.
11. Husserl E. Ideas: A General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. 1931;Humanities Press, New York.
12. Glaser B.C. Theoretical Sensitivity. 1978;Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
13. Strauss A.L., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 1990;Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
14. Kvale S. Interviews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. 1996;Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
15. Guba E. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ. 29:1981;75-91.
16. Madison G.B. Method in interpretation. Edie JM The Hermeneutics of Postmodernity. Figures and Themes. 1988;25-39 Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
17. Elder N.C., Miller W.L. Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies. J. Fam. Pract. 41:1995;279-285.
18. Lincoln Y.S. Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretative research. Qual. Inq. 1:1995;275-289.
19. Hamberg K., Johansson E., Lindgren G., Westman G. Scientific rigour in qualitative research - examples from a study of women's health in family practice. Fam. Pract. 11:1994;176-181.
20. Malterud K. Shared understanding of the qualitative research process; guidelines for the medical researcher. Fam. Pract. 10:1993;201-206.
21. Magnuson B. Tubal closing failure in retraction type cholesteatoma and adhesive middle ear lesions. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh). 86:1978;408-417.
22. Magnuson B. On the origin of the high negative pressure in the middle ear space. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2:1981;1-12.
23. Bunne M., Falk B., Hellström S., Magnuson M. The character and consequences of disturbing sound sensations in retraction type middle ear disease. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 51:1999;11-21.