Evaluation of oculokinetic perimetry

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 306-311

  Chia, W L A ^a   Goldberg, I ^a,c   Bauman, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c Park House   (Australia)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Oculokinetic perimetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GAZE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PERIMETRY; PREVALENCE; SCREENING TEST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0032723210     PISSN: 08149763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1606.1999.00215.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey PR. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmol. 1996; 103: 1661-9.
2. Damato BE. Oculokinetic perimetry: a simple visual field test for use in the community. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1985; 69: 927-31.
3. Damato BE. Assessment of the visual field by anyone, anywhere, and at any time. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. U.K. 1985; 104: 681-5.
4. Damato BE, Ahmed B, Allan D, McClure E, Jay JL. The detection of glaucomatous visual field by OKP. Which points art best for screening. Eye 1989, 3: 727-31.
5. Clark BJ. Oculokinetic perimetry for the assessment of visual fields. Arch. Dis. Childhood 1990; 65: 432-4.
6. Damato BE, Chyla J, McClure E, Jay JL, Allan D. A handheld OKP chart for the screening of glaucoma: preliminary evaluation. Eye 1990; 4: 633-7.
7. Greve M, Chisholm IA. Comparison of the oculokinetic perimetry glaucoma screener with two types of visual field analyser. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 1993; 28: 201-5.
8. Vernon SA, Quigley HA. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser. Eye 1992; 6: 521-4.
9. Harper RA, Hill AR, Reeves BC. Effectiveness of unsupervised oculokinetic perimetry for detecting glaucornatous visual field defects. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 1994; 14: 199-203.
10. Wishart P. Oculokinetic Perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Eye 1993; 7: 113-21.
11. Mutlukan E, Damato BE, Jeffrey LJ. Clinical evaluation of a multifixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous field visual field loss. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1993; 77: 332-8.
12. Sponsel WE, Ritch R, Stamper R, Higginbotham EJ, Anderson DR, Wilson MR, Zimmerman TJ. Prevent Blindness American Visual field screening study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1995; 120: 699-708.
13. Christofferson T, Fors T, Waage S, Holtedahl K. Glaucoma screening with Oculokinetic Perimetry in General Practice: Is its specificity acceptable? Eye 1995; 9: 36-9.
14. Stirling RJ, MacLeod JDA, Vernon SA. A new chart to improve efficiency of glaucoma detection by Oculokinetic Perimetry. Eye 1994; 8: 121-4.