Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms

Medical Physics

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 2266-2272

  Hemminger, Bradley M ^a   Dillon, Alan W ^a   Johnston, R Eugene ^a   Muller, Keith E ^a   Deluca, Marla C ^a   Coffey, Christopher S ^a   Pisano, Etta D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Digital imaging; Display systems; Image display; Image perception; Mammography

Indexed keywords

FEATURE EXTRACTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; PIXELS; X RAY SCREENS;

DIGITAL IMAGING; DISPLAY LUMINANCES; DISPLAY SYSTEM; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PERCEPTION; LUMINANCE CONDITIONS; LUMINANCE DISPLAYS; NEUTRAL DENSITIES;

LUMINANCE;

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CONTRAST; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; DISPLAY SYSTEM; EMBEDDING; IMAGE DISPLAY; LUMINANCE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; X RAY FILM;

EID: 0032718471     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.598740     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. T. N. Cornsweet, Visual Perception (Academic, New York, 1970).
2. C. Murchison, in A Handbook of General Experimental Psychology (Clark University Press, Worcester MA, 1934), p. 769.
3. S. M. Pizer, "Intensity mapping to linearize display devices," Comput. Graph. Image Process. 17, 262-2268 (1981).
4. G. Wyszecki and W. S. Stiles, Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae. 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1982), pp. 567-570.
5. E. Krupinski, H. Roehrig, T. Furukawa, and C. Tang, "Influence of monitor luminance and tone scale on observer detection performance," Proc. SPIE 3340, 99-104 (1998).
6. D. T. Puff, E. D. Pisano, K. E. Muller, R. E. Johnston, B. M. Hemminger, C. A. Burbeck, R. McLelland, and S. M. Pizer, "A method for determination of optimal image enhancement for the detection of mammographic abnormalities," J. Digital Imaging 7, 161-171 (1994).
7. E. D. Pisano, J. Chandramouli, B. M. Hemminger, M. DeLuca, D. Blueck, R. E. Johnston, K. Muller, M. P. Braeuning, and S. M. Pizer, "Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated microcalcifications in dense mammograms?" J. Digital Imaging 10, 79-84 (1997).
8. E. D. Pisano, J. Chandramouli, B. M. Hemminger, M. DeLuca, D. Blueck, R. E. Johnston, K. Muller, M. P. Braeuning, and S. M. Pizer, "Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated masses in dense mammograms?," J. Digital Imaging 10, 174-182 (1997).
9. B. M. Hemminger, A. W. Dillon, and R. E. Johnston, "Evaluation of the effect of display luminance on the feature detection of simulated masses in mammograms," Proc. SPIE 3036 (1997).
10. B. M. Hemminger, R. E. Johnston, J. R. Rolland, K. E. Muller, "Perceptual Linearization of Video Display Monitors for Medical Image Presentation," Proceedings of Medical Imaging 1994: Image Capture, Formatting and Display, Vol. 2164 (1994).
11. D. J. Finney, Probit Analysis, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, London, 1971).
12. K. E. Muller and V. A. Benignus, "Increasing scientific power with statistical power," Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 14, 211-219 (1992).
13. K. E. Muller and V. B. Pasour, "Bias in linear model power and sample size due to estimating variance," Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 26, 839-851 (1997).