Theoretical background and conceptual solution for depth perception and eye-hand coordination problems in laparoscopic surgery

Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 227-234

  Breedveld, P ^a   Stassen, H G ^a   Meijer, D W ^b   Stassen, L P S ^c  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c REINIER DE GRAAF HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Depth perception; Endoscope positioning system; Eye hand coordination; Laparoscopic surgery; Misorientations; Movement parallax

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BINOCULAR VISION; CAMERA; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE HAND COORDINATION; HEAD MOVEMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TRAINING;

EID: 0032717864     PISSN: 13645706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13645709909153166     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Breedveld P. Observation, manipulation, and eye-hand coordination problems in minimally invasive surgery. Proceedings of the 16th European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control. Kassel, Germany: University of Kassel, 9-11 Dec. 1997: 219-31.
2. Breedveld P. Observation, manipulation and eye-hand coordination in minimally invasive surgery - overview of negative effects, experiments and supporting aids. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Design, Engineering and Production, Man-Machine Systems and Control Group, 1998: 49. Report N-510.
3. Stassen HG, Dankelman J, Grimbergen CA, Meijer DW. Man-machine aspects of minimally invasive surgery. Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto International Conference Hall, 16-18 Sept. 1998: 7-18.
4. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
5. Rock I. Perception. New York: Scientific American Library, 1995.
6. Cuschieri A. Visual display technology for endoscopic surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1996; 5: 427-34.
7. Voorhorst FA. Affording action - implementing perception-action coupling for endoscopy [PhD thesis]. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Design, Engineering and Production, Laboratory of Form Theory, 1998.
8. Schurr MO, Buess G, Kunert W et al. Human sense of vision: a guide to future endoscopic imaging systems. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1996; 5: 410-18.
9. Cuschieri A, Buess G, Périssat J, editors. Operative manual of endoscopic surgery. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
10. Motoki T, Isono H, Yuyama I. Present status of three-dimensional television research. Proc IEEE 1995; 83: 1009-21.
11. Frank TG, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Technological aspects of minimal access surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1997; 211(H): 129-44.
12. Pietrabissa A, Scarcello E, Carobbi A, Mosca F. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. Endosc Surg 1994; 2: 315-17.
13. Crosthwaite G, Chung T, Dunkley P et al. Comparison of direct vision and electronic two-and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 849-51.
14. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A. Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 1998; 351: 248-51.
15. Finlay PA, Ornstein MH. Controlling the movement of a surgical laparoscope. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1995; May/June: 289-91.
16. Voorhorst FA, Meijer DW, Overbeeke C, Smets G. Depth perception in laparoscopy through perception-action coupling. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1998; 7: 325-34.
17. Wade NJ. Frames of reference in vision. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1996; 5: 435-9.
18. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A. Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 1998; 227: 481-4.
19. Holden J, Frank TG, Cuschieri A. Developing technology for suspended imaging for minimal access surgery. Sem Laparosc Surg 1997; 4: 74-9.
20. Tendick F, Jennings RW, Tharp G, Stark L. Sensing and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery: experiment, analysis, and observation. Presence 1993; 2(1): 66-80.
21. Rau G, Radermacher K, Thull B, Pichler C von. Aspects of ergonomic system design applied to medical work systems. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R, editors. Computer integrated surgery - technology and clinical applications. Boston: MIT Press, 1996: 203-21.
22. Pichler C von, Radermacher K, Boeckmann W et al. Stereoscopic visualization in endoscopic surgery: problems, benefits, and potentials. Presence 1997; 6(2): 198-217.
23. Bajura M, Fuchs H, Ohbuchi R. Merging virtual objects with the real world: seeing ultrasound imagery within the patient. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R, editors. Computer integrated surgery - technology and clinical applications. Boston: MIT Press, 1996: 245-54.