An integrated planning tool based upon multiple criteria evaluation of spatial information

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 339-357

  Pettit, C ^a   Pullar, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

GIS; Integrated planning tool; Multiple criterion evaluation; Spatial information

Indexed keywords

MULTIPLE CRITERION EVALUATION (MCE);

DATABASE SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); URBAN PLANNING;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

GIS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PLANNING METHOD; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032713374     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00029-0     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arcieri F., Apolloni E., Barella L., Talamo M. HERMES: an integrated approach to modelling data base systems design. Paredaien J. Advances in database systems. 1994;71-93 Springer, New York.
2. Batty M. An approach to rational design. Architectural Design. 7:1971;436-439.
3. Batty, M. (1993). In P. Nijkamp & M. Fischer, Using geographic information systems in urban planning and policy-making, geographic information systems, spatial modelling, and policy evaluation (pp. 51-69). Berlin: Springer.
4. Chadwick G.A. Systems view of planning. 1978;Pergamon Press, Sydney.
5. Clercq F. Information management within the planning process. Scholten H.J., Stillwell J.C.H. Geographical information systems for urban and regional planning. 1990;59-68 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
6. Eastman J.R. IDRISI for Windows: user's guide - Version 2.0. 1997;Clark University, Worcester, MA.
7. Eastman, J. R., Kyem, P. A. K., & Toledano, J. (1993). A procedure for multi-objective decision making in GIS under conditions of competing objectives. In Proceedings, EGIS'93 (pp. 438-447) Italy: Utrecht EGIS.
8. Eastman J.R., Jin W., Kyem A.K., Toledano J. Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 61(5):1995;539-547.
9. Etzioni, A. (1967). Mixed scanning: a 'third' approach to decision making. Public Administration Review, December.
10. Faludi A. A reader in planning theory. 1973;Sydney, Pergamon Press.
11. Geertman S.C.M., Ritsema Van Eck J.R. GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 9(1):1995;67-80.
12. Heywood, I., Oliver, J., & Tomlinson, S. (1995). Building an exploratory multi-criteria modelling environment for spatial decision support. In Innovations in GIS2 (pp. 127-136). London: Taylor and Francis.
13. Jankowski P. Mixed-data multi-criteria evaluation for regional planning: a systematic approach to the decision making process. Environment and Planning A. 21:1989;349-362.
14. Jankowski P. Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 9(3):1995;251-273.
15. Kozlowski J. Planning research and education: looming perspectives. Ekistics. 55(328/329/330):1988;31-38.
16. Laaribi A., Chevallier J., Martel J. Spatial decision aid: a multicriterion evaluation approach. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 20(6):1996;351-366.
17. Lindblom C.E. The intelligence of democracy. 1965;Free Press, New York.
18. Masri A., Moore J. II Integrated planning information systems: context, design requirements, and projects. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 17(6):1993;491-511.
19. McHarg I.L. Design with nature. 1969;Doubleday/Natural History Press, New York.
20. Nijkamp P., Spronk J. Multiple criteria analysis: operational methods. 1981;Gower, Aldershot.
21. Nijkamp P., Van Delft A. Multi-criteria analysis and regional decision-making. 1977;Martimus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division, Leiden.
22. Pereira J.M.C., Duckstein L. A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 7(5):1993;407-424.
23. Seong S.T. Beyond global mapping: exploratory spatial data analysis methods for GIS. 1977;Technological University, Nanyang.
24. Singh, R. R. (1998). Exploiting GIS for sketch planning. http://www.esri.com/base/common/userconf/proc96/TO300/PAP260/P260.HTM .
25. Smith, P. (1980). A review of some methods for weighting criteria in the evaluation of multi-dimensional alternatives (Planning Research Paper No. 4). Queensland: University of Queensland, Department of Regional and Town Planning.
26. Spiekmann, K. & Wegener, M. (1998). Socio-economic and spatial impacts of trans-European networks: the SASI project. In Eighth world conference on transport research, Antwerpen, 12-17 July, 1998.
27. Stasik M., Jankowski P. Using map objects in the internet-based decision support system. 1997;University of Idaho Department of Geography, Idaho.
28. Voogd H. Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. 1983;Pion Ltd, London.
29. Ward, W. S., Grant, D. P. & Chapman, A. J. (1970). A PL/I program for architectural and planning space allocation. In Fifth annual symposium on the application of computers to the problems of urban society (pp. 122-141). New York: Association for Computer Machinery.
30. Willer D.F. Scientific Sociology. 1967;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
31. Yehezkel D. The planning process: a facet design. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 29(1):1963;46-58.