Where nontradition is the norm: Are sex and age determinants of practicing primary care specialties?

Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 967-972

  Nieman, Linda Z ^a   Gracely, Edward J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENDER; GENERAL PRACTICE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERNAL MEDICINE; MALE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSTETRICS; PEDIATRICS; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032712748     PISSN: 15246094     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.1.1999.8.967     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Martini CJM, Veloski J, Barzansky B, Xu G, Fields SK. Medical school and student characteristics that influence choosing a generalist career. JAMA 1994; 272:661.
2. Kahn NB, Garener JG, Schmittling GT, Ostergaard DJ, Graham R. Results of the 1997 national resident matching program: Family practice. Fam Med 1997; 29:553.
3. Scroggs JA, Griffin LP, Bayer L, Schulkin M. Obstetrician/gynecologist as primary care physicians: The prespectives of health maintenance organization medical directors and obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:291.
4. American Professors of Medicine (APM). comprehensive women's health care: The role and commitment of internal medicine. Am J Med 1997;103;451.
5. Joffe A. Women's health begins in pediatrics. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:783.
6. Association of Professors of Medicine. What internists need to know: Core competencies in women's health. Am J Med 1997;1021:507.
7. Recommended core educational guidelines for family practice residents. Women's health. Reprint No. 282. Kansas City, MO: American Academy of Family Practice, 1994.
8. Recommended core educational guidelines for family practice residents. Obstetrics and gynecology. Reprint No. 261. Kansas City, MO: American Academy of Family Practice. 1988.
9. Donoghue GD, ed. Women's health in the curriculum: A resource guide for faculty. Philadelphia, PA: National Academy on Women's Health Medical Education, 1996.
10. Gannon L, Stevens J, Stecker T. A content analysis of obstetrics and gynecology: Implications for women's health. Women's Health 1997;26:41.
11. Barbanzky B, Jonas HS, Etzel SI. Educational programs in US medical schools, 1997-1998. JAMA 1998;280:803, 827.
12. Xu G, Veloski JJ, Barzansky B. Comparison between older and usual-aged medical school graduates on the factors influencing their choices or primary care specialties. Acad Med 1997;72:1003.
13. Outcalt DC, Senf J, Watkins AJ, Bastacky S. The effects of medical school curricula, faculty role models, and biomedical research on choice of generalist physician careers: A review and quality assessment of the literature. Acad Med 1995;70:611.
14. Sutnick A, McLeer S, McLeer S. Programs developed from concerns for women in medicine. J Med Educ 1979;8:627.
15. Peitzman S. A new and untried course: Women's Medical College of Pennsylvania and Medical College of Pennsylvania, 1850-1998. Rutgers University Press, in press.
16. Wooten J. Women in medicine: Bringing gender issues to the fore. JAMA 1977;277:1405.
17. Fall Enrollment Questionnaire and Reported Graduates Report. Table B8: Enrollment of Women Graduates in U.S. Medical Schools AAMC Section for Student Services: Update 11/97:3.
18. Barbanzky B, Jonas HS. Educational programs in US medical schools, 1995-1996. JAMA 1996;276:714, 740.
19. Block SD, Clark-Chiarelli N, Peters AS, Singer JD. Academia's chilling climate for primary care. JAMA 1996;276:677.
20. Block SD, Clark Chiavelli N, Singer JD. Mixed messages about primary care in the culture of U.S. medical schools. Acad Med 1998;73:1087.