RAPD variation in a Norway spruce seedlot: Consequences of somatic embryogenesis

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 662-667

  Passerieux, E ^a   Baud, S ^b   Dulieu, H ^c   Paques M ^a  

^a AFOCEL (Association Foret Cellulose)   (France)

^b Laboratoire de Biométrie   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; NORWAY; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; TREE;

EID: 0032709577     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adams GW, Doiron MG, Park YS, Bonga JM, and Charest PJ, 1994. Commercialization potential of somatic embryogenesis in black spruce improvement. For Chronol 70:593-598.
2. Attree SM and Fowke LC, 1993. Embryogeny of gymnosperms in synthetic seeds technology of conifers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 35:1-35.
3. Baradat PH, Adams WT, and Müller-Starck G, 1995. Population genetics and genetic conservation of forest trees. Amsterdam: SPB Academic.
4. Boscherini G, Morgante M, Rossi P, Vendramin GG, and Vicario F, 1994. Detection of DNA polymorphisms in Pinus leucodermis Ant. using random amplification. For Genetics 1:131-137.
5. Cheliak WM and Rogers DL, 1990. Integrating biotechnology into tree improvement programs. Can J For Res 20:452-463.
6. Fourré JL, Berger P, Niquet L, and André P, 1997. Somatic embryogenesis and somaclonal variation in Norway spruce: morphogenetic, cytogenetic and molecular approaches. Theor Appl Genet 94:159-169.
7. Gianinni R, Morgante M, and Vendramin GG, 1991. Allozyme variation in Italian populations of Picea abies (L.) Karst. Silvae Genet 40:160-166.
8. Gomory D, 1992. Effect of stand origin on the genetic diversity of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) populations. For Ecol Manage 54:215-223.
9. Goncharenko GG, Zadeika IV, Birgelis JJ, and Birgelis YY, 1995. Genetic structure, diversity and differentiation of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) in natural population of Latvia. For Ecol Manage 72:31-38.
10. Gupta PK and Durzan DJ, 1986. Plantlet regeneration via somatic embryogenesis from subcultured callus of mature embryos of Picea abies (Norway spruce). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 22:685-688.
11. Guries RP and Ledig FT, 1982. Genetic diversity and population structure in pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill.). Evolution 36:387-402.
12. Hakman I, Fowke LC, Von Arnold S, and Eriksson T, 1985. The development of somatic embryos in tissue cultures initiated from immature embryos of Picea abies (Norway spruce). Plant Sci 38:53-60.
13. Hamrick JL, Mitton JB, and Linhart YB, 1981. Levels of genetic variation in trees: influence of life history characteristics. In: Isozymes of North American trees and forest insects (Conkle MT, ed). Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-48. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 35-41.
14. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, and Sherman-Broyles SL, 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New For 6:95-124.
15. Heun M and Helentjaris T, 1993. Inheritance of RAPDs in F1 hybrids of corns. Theor Appl Genet 85:961-968.
16. Huff DR, Peakall R, and Smouse PE, 1993. RAPD variation within and among natural populations of outcrossing buffalograss [Buchoë dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm]. Theor Appl Genet 86:927-934.
17. Isabel N, Tremblay L, Michaud M, Tremblay FM, and Bousquet J, 1993. RAPDs as an aid to evaluate the genetic integrity of somatic embryogenesis-derived populations of Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.B. Theor Appl Genet 86:81-87.
18. Isabel N, Beaulieu J, and Bousquet J, 1995. Complete congruence between gene diversity estimates derived from genotypic data at enzyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA loci in black spruce. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:6369-6373.
19. Jaccard P, 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat 44:223-270.
20. Ledig FT, and Conkle MT, 1983. Genetic diversity and genetic structure in a narrow endemic, Torrey pine (Pinus torreyana Parry ex Carr.). Evolution 37:79-85.
21. Liu Z and Furnier GR, 1993. Comparison of allozyme, RFLP, and RAPD markers for revealing genetic variation within and between trembling aspen and bigtooth aspen. Theor Appl Genet 87:97-105.
22. Lundkvist K, 1979. Allozyme frequency distribution in four Swedish populations of Norway spruce (Picea abies) I. Estimations of genetic variation within and among populations, genetic linkage and a mating system parameter. Hereditas 90:127-143.
23. Lynch M and Milligan BG, 1994. Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Mol Ecol 3:91-99.
24. Miksche JP and Hotta Y, 1973. DNA base composition and repetitious DNA in several conifers. Chromosoma 41:29-36.
25. Mitton JB, 1983. Conifers. In: Isozymes, genetics and breeding, part B (Tanksley S and Orton T, eds). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 443-472.
26. Mosseler A, Egger KN, and Hughes GA, 1992. Low levels of genetic diversity in red pine confirmed by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Can J For Res 22: 1332-1337.
27. Neale DB and Williams CG, 1991. Restriction fragment length polymorphism mapping in conifers and applications to forest genetics and tree improvement. Can J For Res 21:545-554.
28. Ohri D and Khoshoo TN, 1986. Genome size in gymnosperms. Plant Syst Evol 153:119-132.
29. Park YS, Pond SE, and Bonga JM, 1993. Initiation of somatic embryogenesis in white spruce (Picea glauca): genetic control in culture treatment effects and implication for tree breeding. Theor Appl Genet 86:427-436.
30. Park YS, Pond SE, and Bonga JM, 1994. Somatic embryogenesis in white spruce (Picea glauca): genetic control in somatic embryos exposed to storage, maturation treatments, germination, and cryopreservation. Theor Appl Genet 89:742-750.
31. Rogers SO and Bendich AJ, 1985. Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues. Plant Mol Biol 5:69-76.
32. Ruaud JN, Bercetche J, and Pâques M, 1992. First evidence of somatic embryogenesis from needles of 1-year-old Picea abies plants. Plant Cell Rep 11:563-566.
33. SAS, 1987. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
34. Smith DR, Warr A, Grace LJ, Walter C, and Hargreaves CL, 1994. Somatic embryogenesis joins the plantation forestry revolution in New-Zealand. In: Proceedings of the 1994 Biological Sciences Symposium (ed, anon.). Atlanta, GA: Tappi Press; 19-29.
35. Tigerstedt PMA, 1973. Studies of isoenzyme variation in marginal and central populations of Picea abies. Hereditas 75:47-67.
36. Trolinder NL and Xhixian C, 1989. Genotype specificity of the somatic embryogenesis response in cotton. Plant Cell Rep 8:133-136.
37. Welsh J and McClelland M, 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:7213-7218.
38. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, and Tingey SV, 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531-6535.
39. Wright S, 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19:395-420.
40. Wright S, 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol 2, The theory of gene frequencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 11-15.
41. Yeh F and Layton C, 1979. The organization of genetic variability in central and marginal populations of lodgepole pine Pinus contorta. Can J Genet Cytol 21:487-503.
42. Xie CY and Knowles P, 1994. Mating system and effec-tive pollen immigration in a Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) plantation. Silvae Genet 43:48-52.