Impact of Health Care Financing Administration changes on stroke rehabilitation

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 943-955

  Melvin, J L ^a  

^a MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW; STROKE; TAX;

EID: 0032706826     PISSN: 10479651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1047-9651(18)30172-4     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Carter G, Relies D, Buchanan J, et al, A classification system for inpatient medical rehabilitation patients: A review and proposed revisions to the functional independence measure-function related groups. PM-682-HCFA, a project memorandum prepared for the Health Care Financing Administration by the RAND/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Policy Research, Santa Monica 1997
2. Carter G, Relies D, Buchanan J, et al: A prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation. PM-683-HCFA, a project memorandum prepared for the Health Care Financing Administration by the RAND/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research, Santa Monica 1997
3. Comparison of operating data rehabilitation hospitals, 1988-1997 AMRPA Magazine 2 1999 30
4. R.B. Fetter Y. Shin J.L. Freeman Case mix definition by diagnosis related groups Med Care 18 1980 39
5. P. Fleming Rehab under the balanced budget act AMRPA Magazine 1 1998 7 12
6. S. Hosek R. Kane M. Carney Charges and outcomes for rehabilitation care Implications for the prospective payment system (R-3424-HCFA), the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica 1986
7. Medicare's post-acute care benefit: background, trends, and issues to be, faced., Dept of Health and Human Services 1999 Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy Washington
8. Rules and regulations Federal Register 63 1998 40974 40983
9. M.G. Stineman Function-related groups 101: A primer Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 10 1998 319 358
10. M.G. Stineman J.J. Escarce J.E. Goin A case mix classification system for medical rehabilitation Med Care 32 1994 366
11. M.G. Stineman C.V. Granger J.J. Escarce A prototype classification system for medical rehabilitation. 1993 American Rehabilitation Association Washington
12. M.G. Stineman C.J. Tassoni J.J. Escarce Development of FRGs 2.0. A classification system for medical rehabilitation Health Serv Res 32 1997 529 548
13. C. Zollar Transfer rule: Its current status AMRPA Magazine 2 1999 29 31
14. C. Zollar MedPac rejects HCFA RUGs approach; Embraces FRGs AMRPA Magazine 2 1999 13 15