Diagnostic usefulness of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging with dynamic contrast-enhancement in patients with localized prostate cancer: Mapping studies with biopsy specimens

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 593-599

  Tanaka, Nobumichi ^a   Samma, Shoji ^a   Joko, Masanori ^a   Akiyama, Tatsuya ^a   Takewa, Megumi ^a   Kitano, Satoru ^b   Okajima, Eigoro ^b  

^a NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dynamic contrast enhancement; Endorectal coil; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM;

EID: 0032706382     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.1999.00116.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Wang MC, Valenzuela LA, Murphy GP, Chu TM. Purification of a human prostate specific antigen. Investig. Urol. 1979; 17: 159-63.
2. Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Redwine E. Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987; 317: 909-16.
3. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch. (eds.) UICC TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997; 170-173.
4. Platt JF, Bree RL, Schwab RE. The accuracy of CT in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. AJR 1987; 149: 315-18.
5. Schnall MD, Imai Y, Tomaszewski J, Pollack HM, Lenkinski RE, Kressel HY. Prostate cancer: Local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 178: 797-802.
6. Schiebler ML, Schnall MD, Pollack HM et al. Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Radiology 1993; 189: 339-52.
7. Chelsky MJ, Schnall MD, Seidmon EJ, Pollack HM. Use of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. J. Urol. 1993; 150: 391-5.
8. Sugimura Y, Arima K, Hayashi N et al. Endorectal MRI of the prostate gland: Report of representative images. Nishinihon J. Urol. 1997; 59: 86-90.
9. Tempany CM, Zhou X, Zerhouni EA et al. Staging of prostate cancer: Results of Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group Project comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Radiology 1994; 192: 47-54.
10. Outwater EK, Petersen RO, Siegelman ES, Gomella LG, Chernesky CE, Mitchell DG. Prostate carcinoma: Assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images. Radiology 1994; 193: 333-9.
11. Bezzi M, Kressel HY, Allen KS et al. Prostatic carcinoma: Staging with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988; 169: 339-46.
12. Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: Results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J. Urol. 1994; 151: 1283-90.
13. Jager GJ, Ruijter ETG, vd Kaa CA et al. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: Correlation with histopathologic results. Radiology 1997; 203: 645-52.