Pain perception, somatosensory event-related potentials and skin conductance responses to painful stimuli in high, mid, and low hypnotizable subjects: Effects of differential pain reduction strategies

Pain

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 499-508

  De Pascalis, Vilfredo ^a   Magurano, Maria R ^a   Bellusci, Anna ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hypnotic analgesia; Hypnotizability; Pain related somatosensory event related potentials and skin conductance responses; Pain sensation; Reaction time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISTRESS SYNDROME; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOSIS; HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; NOCICEPTIVE STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN CONDUCTANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS, ANESTHETIC; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0032704673     PISSN: 03043959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00157-8     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arendt-Nielsen L., Zachariae R., Bjerring P. Quantitative evaluation of hypnotically suggested hypeaesthesia analgesia by painful laser stimulation. Pain. 42:1990;243-251.
2. Barabasz A., Barabasz M., Jensen J., Calvin S., Trevisan M., Warner D. Cortical event-related potentials show the structure of hypnotic suggestions is crucial. Int J Clin Exp Hypnosis. 47:1999;5-22.
3. Barry R.J. Scoring criteria for response latency habituation in electrodermal research: a study in the context of orienting response. Psychophysiology. 27:1990;94-100.
4. Barry R.J., Sokolov E.N. Habituation of phasic tonic components of the orienting reflex. Int J Psychophysiol. 15:1993;39-42.
5. Birbaumer N., Elbert T. P3: Byoproduct of a byoproduct. Behav Brain Sci. 11:1988;375-376.
6. Birbaumer N., Elbert T., Canavan A., Rockstroh B. Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex behavior. Physiol Rev. 70:1990;1-41.
7. Blom J.L., Anneveldt M. An electrode cap tested. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 54:1982;591-594.
8. Bowers K.S. Unconscious influences hypnosis. Singer J.L. Repression Dissociation: Implications for Personality Theory, Psychopathology Health. 1990;143-178 University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Bowers K.S. Imagination dissociation in hypnotic responding. Int J Clin Exp Hypnosis. 40:1992;253-275.
10. Brown D.P., Fromm E. Hypnosis Behavioral Medicine. 1986;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Chapman C.R., Nakamura Y. Hypnotic analgesia: a constructivist framework. Int J Clin Exp Hypnosis. 1:1998;6-27.
12. Chaves J.F. Recent advances in the application of hypnosis to pain management. Am J Clin Hypnosis. 37:1994;117-129.
13. Crawford H.J. Cognitive psychophysiological correlates of hypnotic responsiveness hypnosis. Fass M.L., Brown D.P. Creative Mastery in hypnosis hypnoanalysis: a festschrift for Erika Fromm. 1990;155-168 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
14. Crawford H.J. Brain dynamics hypnosis: attentional disattentional processes. Int J Clin Exp Hypnosis. 42:1994;204-232.
15. Crawford H.J., Knebel T., Kaplan L., Vendemia J.M.C. Hypnotic analgesia: 1. Somatosensory event-related potential changes to noxious stimuli 2. Transfer learning to reduce chronic low back pain. Int J Clin Exp Hypnosis. 1:1998;92-132.
16. Dawson M.E., Schell A.M., Filion D.L. The electrodermal system. Cacioppo J.T., Tassinary L.G. Principles of Psychophysiology - Physical, Social, Inferential Elements. 1990;295-324 Cambridge University Press, New York.
17. De Pascalis V., Carboni G. P300 event-related-potential amplitudes evoked cardiac responses during hypnotic alteration of somatosensory perception. Int J Neurosci. 92:1997;187-208.
18. De Pascalis V., Perrone M. EEG asymmetry heart rate during experience of hypnotic analgesia in high low hypnotizables. Int J Psychophysiol. 21:1996;163-175.
19. De Pascalis V., Crawford H.J., Marucci F.S. Analgesia ipnotica nella modulazione del dolore: effetti sui potenziali somatosensoriali. Comun Sci Psicol Gener. 7:1992;71-89.
20. Edmonston W.E. Jr. Hypnosis electrodermal responses. Am J Clin Hypnosis. 11:1968;16-25.
21. Fowles D.C., Christie M.J., Edelberg R., Grings W., Lykken D.T., Venables P.H. Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurement. Psychophysiology. 18:1981;232-239.
22. Galbraith G.C., Cooper L.M., London P. Hypnotic susceptibility the sensory evoked response. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 80:1972;509-514.
23. Glass A. Intensity of attenuation of alpha activity by mental arithmetic in females males. Physiol Behav. 3:1968;217-220.
24. Graham F.K., Hackley S.A. Passive active attention to input. Jennings J.R., Coles M.G.H. Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology. 1991;251-356 John Wiley Sons, New York.
25. Gruzelier J.H. A working model of the neurophysiology of hypnosis: a review of evidence. Cont Hypnosis. 15:1998;3-21.
26. Gruzelier J.H., Brow T.D. Psychophysiological evidence for a state theory of hypnosis susceptibility. J Psychosom Res. 29:1985;287-302.
27. Halliday A.M., Mason A.A. Cortical evoked potentials during hypnotic anaesthesia. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 16:1964;314.
28. Hilgard E.R. Divided Consciousness: Multiple Controls in Human Thought Action. 1986;Wiley, New York.
29. Hilgard ER, Hilgard JR. Hypnosis in the relief of pain. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann, 1983.
30. Holroyd J. Hypnosis treatment of clinical pain: Understanding why hypnosis is useful. Int J Clin Exp Hypnosis. 44:1996;33-51.
31. Jodo E., Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a go/no-go task. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 82:1991;477-482.
32. Johnston V.S., Wang X.T. The relationship between menstrual phase the P3 component of ERPs. Psychophysiology. 28:1991;400-409.
33. Kiernan B.D., Dane J.R., Phillips L.H., Price D.D. Hypnotic analgesia reduces R-III nociceptive flexion reflex: further evidence concerning the multifactorial nature of hypnotic analgesia. Pain. 60:1995;39-47.
34. Kirk RE. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont: Brooks, 1968.
35. Kropotov J.D., Crawford H.J., Polyakov Y.I. Somatosensory event-related potential changes to painful stimuli during hypnotic analgesia: anterior cingulate cortex anterior temporal cortex intracranial recordings. Int J Psychophysiol. 27:1997;1-8.
36. Laidlaw T.M., Booth R.J., Large R.G. Reduction in skin reactions to histamine after a hypnotic procedure. Psychosom Med. 58:1996;242-248.
37. Meier W., Klucken M., Soyka D., Bromm B. Hypnotic hypo- hyperanalgesia: divergent effects on pain ratings pain-related cerebral potentials. Pain. 53:1993;175-181.
38. Meszaros I., Banyai E.I., Greguss A.C. Evoked potential, reflecting hypnotically altered state of consciousness. Adam G., Meszaros I., Banyai E.I. Advances in Physiological Sciences, Vol. 17, Brain Behaviour. 1980;467-475 Pergamon, Oxford.
39. Miller M.E., Bowers K.S. Hypnotic analgesia: dissociated experience or dissociated control? J Abnor Psychol. 102:1993;29-38.
40. Morgan AH, Hilgard JR. The Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for adults. Am J Clin Hypnosis 1978-1979;21:134-147.
41. Orne M.T. Hypnotic methods for managing pain. Bonica J.J. Advances in Pain Research Therapy, Vol. 5. 1983;Raven Press, New York.
42. Palomba D., Angrilli A., Mini A. Visual evoked potentials, heart rate responses memory to emotional pictorial stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol. 27:1997;55-67.
43. Pribram K.H. Brain perception: holonomy structure in figural processing. 1991;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
44. Pribram K.H., McGuinness D. Arousal, activation, effort in the control of attention. Psychol Rev. 82:1975;116-149.
45. Radilova J. The late positive components of visual evoked responses sensitive to emotional factors. Activitas Nervosa Superior. 3:(Suppl.):1982;334.
46. Sokolov E.N. Perception and the conditioned reflex. 1963;Pergamon, Oxford.
47. Velden M., Wolk C. Pain perception cardiac activity under hypnosis relaxation training. Arch Psychol. 139:1987;107-114.
48. Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER. Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1962.
49. Wickramasekera I. On the interaction of hypnotizability negative affect in chronic pain - implications for the somatization of trauma. J Nerv Ment Dis. 10:1996;628-635.
50. Zachariae R., Bjerring P. Laser-induced pain-related brain potentials sensory pain ratings in high low hypnotizable subjects during hypnotic suggestions of relaxation, dissociated imagery, focused analgesia, placebo. Int J Clin Exp Hypnosis. XLII:1994;56-80.