From tenure to rights: Conceptualizing the changing focus of housing law in england

Housing, Theory and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 31-42

  Blandy, Sarah ^a   Goodchild, Barry ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Juridification; Law; Rights; Tenure

Indexed keywords

HOUSING POLICY; LEGISLATION; TENURE RELATIONS;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0032702477     PISSN: 14036096     EISSN: 16512278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14036099950150071     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Arden, A. and M. Partington (1997) Housing Law. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
2. Avramov, D. (1995) Homelessness in the European Union: Social and Legal Context of Housing Exclusion in the 1990s. Brussels: FEANTSA.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press/Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
4. Carr, H. (1997) “The sorting of the forks from the spades: an unnecessary distraction in housing law?”, 107–125 in Cowan, D. (ed.), Housing: Participation and Exclusion. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
5. Coghlan, M. (1996) “Adequate housing in the EU: rights and realities”, The Courier (ACP-EU) 160: 55–57.
6. Cole, I., Gidley, G., Robinson, D. and Y. Smith (1997) “The impact of leasehold reform: experiences of the leasehold enfranchisement provisions of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993”, Final Report to the Department of the Environment, Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University (to be published by HMSO).
7. Cowan, D. and J. Fionda (1998) “Homelessness”, 257–278 in Bright, S. and J. Dewar (eds.), Land Law: Themes and Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Crisp, A. (1989) “Council’s Choice”, Housing, March: 25.2: 33–35.
9. Deflem, M. (1996) “Introduction: law in Habermas’s theory of communicative action”, 1–20 in Deflem, M. (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law. London/Thousand Oaks/ Delhi: Sage Publications.
10. Foucault, M. (1984) “Truth and Power”, 51–75 in Rabinov, P. (ed.), The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11. Goodchild, B. (1997) Housing and the Urban Environment. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
12. Goodrich, P. (1990) Languages of Law: From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
13. Grey, K. (1991) “Property in thin air”, Cambridge Law Journal 50 (2): 252–307.
14. Grey, T. (1980) “The disintegration of property”, Nomos New York 22: 69–83.
15. Habermas, J. (1971) Toward a Rational Society. London: Heinemann.
16. Habermas, J. (1986) “Law as medium and law as institution”, 204–220 in Teubner, G. (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
17. Hayek, F. A. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
18. Hirschman, O. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Boston: Harvard University Press.
19. Hohfeld, W. (1978 [1919]) Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
20. Honoré, A. M. (1961) “Ownership”, 107–147 in Guest, A. G. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Hood, M. (1998) One for All – A Single Tenancy for Social Housing. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.
22. Hunter, C. and J. Miles (1997) “The unsettling of settled law on “settled accommodation”: the House of Lords and the homelessness legislation old and new”, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 19 (3): 267–290.
23. Hunter, C. and J. Nixon (1996) Housing Cases in County Court. York: Policy Press, in association with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
24. Hunter, C. and J. Nixon (1998) “Better a Public Tenant than Private Borrower Be: the Possession Process and the Threat of Eviction”. 84–106 in Cowan, D. (ed.), Housing: Participation and Exclusion. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
25. Jacobs, K. and T. Manzi (1996) “Discourse and policy change: the significance of language for housing research”, Housing Studies 11 (4): 543–560.
26. Kearns, A. and S. J. Smith (1989) Housing Studies of the New Times: on postFordism and postmodernism. Glasgow: University of Glasgow Centre for Housing Research, Discussion Paper 32.
27. Kemeny, J. (1992) Housing and Social Structure: Towards a Sociology of Residence. Bristol: University of Bristol School for Advanced Urban Studies, Working Paper 102.
28. Leckie, S. (1995) “The justiciability of housing rights”, 35–76 in Coomans, F. and F. van Hoof (eds.), The Right to Complain about Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. SIM Special Paper No. 18. Utrecht: Netherlands Institute of Human Rights.
29. Liell, P. (1981) Council Houses and the Housing Act 1980.
30. Lipietz, A. (1997) “La politique du logement social du néolibéralisme”, 59–74 in Benguigui, F. (ed.), La politique du logement a` l’épreuve de la précarité. Paris: Le Plan Construction et Architecture.
31. Loughlin, M. (1996) Legality and Locality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32. Luhmann, N. (1986) “The self-reproduction of law and its limits”, 111–127 in Teubner, G. (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
33. Lyall, A. (1994) Land Law in Ireland. Dublin: Oak Tree Press.
34. Marcuse, P. (1996) “Privatisation and its discontents: property rights in land and housing in the transition in Eastern Europe”, 119–191 in Andrusz, G., Harloe, M. and I. Szelenyi (eds.), Cities after Socialism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
35. Marmor, A. (1992) Interpretation and Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
36. Olivecrona, K. (1971) Law as Fact (2nd ed.). London: Stevens.
37. Penner, J. (1992) “The idea of property in law”, Unpublished University of Oxford PhD thesis.
38. Penner, J. (1996) The Categories of Legal Thought. Unpublished: Economic and Social Research Council End of Award Report.
39. Penner, J. (1997) The Idea of Property in Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
40. Pierre, B. (1997) “Classification of property and conceptions of ownership in civil and common law”, Revue générale de droit 28: 235–274.
41. Plan Construction et Architecture (1996) Nouveaux modes d’acce`s et d’occupation du logement. Consultation internationale de recherche prospective. Paris: Ministe`re de l’Equipement, du Logement, des Transports et du Tourisme.
42. Radin, M. J. (1993) Reinterpreting Property. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
43. Richardson, T. (1996) “Foucauldian discourse: power and truth in urban and regional policy making”, European Planning Studies 4 (3): 276–292.
44. Rose, C. (1994) Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory and Rhetoric of Ownership. Boulder/San Francisco/Oxford: Westview Press.
45. Somerville, P. (1998) “Empowerment through residence”, Housing Studies 13 (2): 233–257.
46. Sorensen, A. D. and R. A. Day (1981) “Libertarian planning”, The Town Planning Review 52 (4): 390–402.
47. Stewart, A. (1994) “Rethinking housing law: a contribution to the debate on tenure”, Housing Studies 9 (2): 263–279
48. Stewart, A.(1996) Rethinking Housing Law. London: Stewart and Maxwell.
49. Stillman, XXX (1980) “Property, freedom and individuality in Hegel’s and Marx’s political thought”, Nomos New York 22: 130–167.
50. Swain, S. (1997) “Postmodern narratives and the absurdity of law”, 1–27 in Earnshaw, S. (ed.), Just Postmodernism. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Editions Rodopi BV.
51. Teubner, G. (1987) “Juridification – concepts, aspects, limits, solutions”, 3–48 in Teubner, G. (ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
52. Van Aerschot, P. (1998) “Juridification from the point of view of modernization”, 192–198 in ARSP (Archiv fu¨r Rechts-und Sozial Philosophie), Beiheft Nr. 68. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
53. Waldron, J. (1988) The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
54. Whitehead, C., Kleinman, M. and A. Chattrabhuttii (1995) The Privately Rented Housing Market: a Review of Current Trends and Future Prospects. London: Council of Mortgage Lenders.
55. Williams, J. (1996) “Recovering the full complexity of our traditions: new developments in property theory”, Journal of Legal Education 46 (4): 596–608.