A point pattern analysis of the distribution of earthquakes in Normandy (France)

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 742-749

  Amorese, D ^a   Lagarde, J L ^a   Laville, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE; EPICENTER; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

FRANCE; NORMANDY;

EID: 0032700626     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Asano, T. and N. Katoh (1996). Variants for the Hough transform for line detection, Comput. Geom. 6, 231-252.
2. Briggs, P., F. Press, and Sh. A. Guberman (1977). Pattern recognition applied to earthquake epicenters in California and Nevada, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 88, 161-173.
3. Chantraine, J., A. Autran, and C. Cavelier (1996). Carte géologique de la France au 1/1000000, 6ème édition, Ed. BRGM, France.
4. Cuthbertson, R. J. (1990). Seismo-tectonics of southeastern Queensland, in The Eromanga-Brisbane Geoscience Transect: A Guide to Basin Development across Phanerozoic Australia in Southern Queensland, D. M. Finlayson (Editor), Bulletin Bureau Mineral Resources Geology and Geophysics, Australia, Vol. 232, 67-81.
5. Dupret, L., E. Dissler, F. Doré, F. Gresselin, and J. Le Gall (1990). Cadomian geodynamic evolution of the Northeastern Armorican Massif (Normandy and Maine), in The Cadomian Orogeny, R. S. D.' Lemos, R. A. Strachan, and C. G. Topley (Editors), Geol. Soc. Special Publ. 51, 115-131.
6. Fehler, M., L. House, and H. Kaieda (1987). Determining planes along which earthquakes occur: method and application to earthquakes accompanying hydraulic facturing, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 9407-9414.
7. Gelfand, I. M., Sh. A. Guberman, V. I. Keilis-Borok, L. Knopoff, F. Press, E. Ya. Ranzman, I. M. Rotwain, and A. M. Sadovsky (1976). Pattern recognition applied to the earthquake epicenters in California, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 11, 227-283.
8. Hough, P. V. C. (1962). Method and means for recognizing complex patterns, U.S. Patent 3069654.
9. Jones, R. H. and R. C. Stewart (1997). A method for determining significant structures in a cloud of earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 8245-8254.
10. Lutz, T. M. (1986). An analysis of the orientations of large-scale crustal structures: a statistical approach based on areal distributions of point-like features, J. Geophys. Res. 91, 421-434.
11. Montgomery, D. C. (1996). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 3rd ed., Wiley New York, 500 pp.
12. Nicolas, M., J. P. Santoire, and P. Y. Delpech (1990). Intraplate seismicity: new seismotectonic data in Western Europe, Tectonophysics 179, 25-53.
13. Panozzo, R. (1987). Two-dimensional strain determination by the inverse SURFOR wheel, J. Struct. Geol. 9, 115-119.
14. Ripley, B. D. (1981). Spatial Statistics, Wiley, New York.
15. Wessel, P. and W. H. F. Smith (1991). Free software helps map and display data, EOS 72, 441, 445-446.
16. Wynns, R. (1977). Tectonique récente dans l'Ouest du bassin de Paris: méthodes d'étude et bilan des déformations plio-quaternaires, Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr. 7, no. XIX, 1093-1101.
17. Zhang, D. and T. Lutz (1989). Structural control of igneous complexes and kimberlites: a new statistical method, Tectonophysics 159, 137-148.