A functional strategy for classifying patients after traumatic spinal cord injury

Spinal Cord

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 717-725

  Stineman, M G ^a   Marino, R J ^b   Deutsch, A ^c   Granger, C V ^c   Maislin, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Outcome assessment; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER FUNCTION; CLIMBING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CODING; PERSONAL HYGIENE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION CENTER; SPINAL CORD INJURY; WHEELCHAIR;

EID: 0032698869     PISSN: 13624393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100914     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lasfargues JF. et al. A model for estimating spinal cord injury prevalence in the United States. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 62-68.
2. Buchanan LE. An Overview. In: Buchanan LE, Nawoczenski DA (eds.). Spinal Cord Injury: Concepts and Management Approaches. Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD 1987, p. 17.
3. American Spinal Injury Association. Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association: Chicago, IL 1982.
4. Granger CV et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1986; 1: 59-74.
5. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The Functional Independence Measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. In MG Eisenberg and RC Grzesiak (eds.) Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 1. Springer Publishing Company: New York, NY 1987, pp. 6-18.
6. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FIM), Version 4.0. Research Foundation, State University of New York at Buffalo: Buffalo, NY 1994.
7. Maynard FM et al. International Standards Cot Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 266-274.
8. Middleton JW, Truman G. Geraghty TJ. Neurological level effect on the discharge functional status of spinal cord injured persons after rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1428-1432.
9. Stover SL, DeLisa JA, Whiteneck GG. Spinal Cord Injury. Clinical Outcomes from the Model Systems. Aspen: Gaithersburg, MD 1995.
10. Stineman MG et al. Discharge Motor FIM-Function Related Groups. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 980-985.
11. Stineman MG, Fiedler RC, Granger CV, Maislin G. Functional task benchmarks for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 497-504.
12. Hamilton BB et al. A uniform data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ (ed.), Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.: Baltimore, MD 1987. pp. 137-148.
13. Linacre JM et al. The Structure and Stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 127-132.
14. Stineman MG et al. The Functional independence Measure: Tests of Scaling Assumptions, Structure, and Reliability across 20 Diverse Impairment Categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1101-1108.
15. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group: Belmont, CA 1984.
16. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. PWS-Kent Publishing Co.: Boston 1987.
17. Harvey RF, Jellinek HM. Patient Profiles: Utilization in Functional Performance Assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 268-271.
18. Gresham GE et al. The Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF): sensitivity and reliability demonstrated in a study of thirty quadriplegic patients. Paraplegia 1986; 24: 38-44.
19. Marino RJ et al. Assessing selfcare status in quadriplegia: comparison of the Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF) and the Functional independence Measure (FIM). Paraplegia 1993; 31: 225-233.
20. Catz A et al. SCIM spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 850-856.
21. Heinemann AW et al. Relationships between disability measures and nursing effort during medical rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 143-149.
22. Hamilton BB et al. Relation of Disability costs to function: spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 385-391.
23. Davidoff GN, Roth EJ, Haughton JS, Ardner MS. Cognitive dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients: sensitivity of the Functional Independence Measure subscales vs neuropsychologic assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 326-329.