Esophagogastric anastomoses in rats - An experimental model

Journal of Investigative Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 295-298

  Cui, Yingjie ^a   Urschel, John D ^a,b   Petrelli, Nicholas J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b ST JOSEPH S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Animal model; Esophagectomy; Gastrointestinal anastomoses; Rat; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ESOPHAGUS ANASTOMOSIS; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; ESOPHAGUS SURGERY; FEMALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SIDE TO SIDE ANASTOMOSIS; WOUND HEALING;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMAL NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; ANIMALS; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; FEMALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SUTURES; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0032698707     PISSN: 08941939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/089419399272412     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Urschel JD. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: A review. Am J Surg. 1995; 169:634-640.
2. Dewar L, Gelfand G, Finley RJ, Evans K, Inculet R, Nelems B. Factors affecting cervical anastomotic leak and stricture formation following esophagogastrectomy and gastric tube interposition. Am J Surg. 1992;163:484-489.
3. Valverde A, Hay J-M, Fingerhut A, Elhadad A. Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: A controlled trial. Surgery. 1996; 120:476-483.
4. Koruda MJ, Rolandelli RH. Experimental studies on the healing of colonic anastomoses. J Surg Res. 1990;48:504-515.
5. Hendriks T, Mastboom WJB. Healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses. Parameters for repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:891-901.
6. Levi A, Ramadan E, Gelber E, Koren R, Chaimoff C, Kyzer S. Healing of the esophageal suture line: Does it differ from the rest of the alimentary tract? Isr J Med Sci. 1996;32:1313-1316.
7. Urschel JD, Takita H, Antkowiak JG. The effect of ischemic conditioning on gastric wound healing in the rat: Implications for esophageal replacement with stomach. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;38:535-538.
8. Goldsmith HS, Kiely AA, Randall HT. Protection of intrathoracic esophageal anastomoses by omentum. Surgery. 1968;63:464-468.
9. Pearlstein L, Azneer IB, Polk HC Jr. An experimental assessment of esophageal anastomotic integrity. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;146:545-550.
10. Mannell A, Lambrechts H, Becker PJ, Oosthuizen MMJ. The effect of acute blood loss and transfusion on the esophageal anastomosis. Res Surg. 1990;2:112-116.
11. Schilling MK, Mettler D, Redaelli C, Buchler MW. Circulatory and anatomic differences among experimental gastric tubes as esophageal replacement. World J Surg. 1997;21:992-997.
12. Urschel JD. Esophagogastric anastomotic leaks: The importance of gastric ischemia and therapeutic applications of gastric conditioning. J Invest Surg. 1998;11:245-250.
13. Urschel JD. Ischemic conditioning of the rat stomach: Implications for esophageal replacement with stomach. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;36:191-193.
14. Urschel JD. The effect of ischaemia on anastomotic wound healing in the rat stomach. Med Sci Res. 1996;24:35-36.
15. Urschel JD. Ischaemic conditioning improves gastric wound healing in rats. Med Sci Res. 1996;24:307-308.
16. Urschel JD, Antkowiak JG, DeLacure MD, Takita H. Ischemic conditioning (delay phenomenon) improves esophagogastric anastomotic wound healing in the rat. J Surg Oncol. 1997;66:254-256.