Fortuitous consequence: The domestic politics of the 1991 Canada-United States Agreement on Air Quality

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 347-359

  Allison, Juliann Emmons ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS; NATIONAL POLITICS; POLLUTION CONTROL;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032695832     PISSN: 00190292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01972.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allison, J. (1996, April). Following the leader: The role of domestic politics in the U.S.-Canada acid rain dispute. Prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, CA.
2. Alm, L. (1993). Regional influences and environmental policymaking: A study of acid rain. Policy Studies Journal, 21, 638-650.
3. Bates, D. V., & Sizto, R. (1989). The Ontario air pollution study: Identification of the causative agents. Health and Environmental Perspectives 79, 69-72.
4. Benedick, R. E. (1991). Ozone diplomacy: New directions in safeguarding the planet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bilateral Research Consultation Group on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollutants. (1979). The LRTAP problem. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
6. Brunnée, J. (1988). Acid rain and ozone layer depletion: International law and regulation. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational.
7. Bryner, G. C. (1995). Blue skies, green politics: The Clean Air Act of 1990. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
8. Carroll, J. E. (1983). Environmental diplomacy: An examination and prospective of Canada-U.S. transboundary environmental relations. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
9. Cohen, R. E. (1992). Washington at work: Back rooms and clean air. New York, NY: Macmillan.
10. Cotton, R., & Zimmer, J. S. (1992). Canadian environmental law: An overview. Canada-United States Law Journal, 18, 63-85.
11. Falsgraf, W. W. (1992). Environmental protection - the U.S. approach. Canada-United States Law Journal, 15, 51-61.
12. Federal-Provincial Research and Monitoring Coordinating Committee. (1990). Canadian long-range transport of air pollutants and acid deposition study, part 6. Ottawa, Canada: Government Printing Office.
13. Finnemore, M. (1996). National interests in international society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14. Gamman, J. K. (1994). Overcoming obstacles in environmental policymaking: Creating partnerships through mediation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
15. Glass, G. E. (1979). Impacts of air pollutants on wilderness areas of northern Minnesota. Duluth, MN: United States Environmental Protection Agency Environment Research Laboratory.
16. Government of Canada. (1992). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency national lake and stream surveys. Acid rain damage. Ottawa, Canada: Government Printing Office.
17. Griedman, J. M., & McMahon, M. S. (1984). The silent alliance: Canadian support for acid rain controls in the United States and the campaign for additional electricity exports. Chicago, IL: Regenery Gateway.
18. Haas, P. M. (1992a). Banning chloroflourocarbons: Epistemic community efforts to protect the stratospheric ozone. International Organization 46, 187-224.
19. Haas, P. M. (1992b). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46, 1-36.
20. Haas, P. M., Keohane, R. O., & Levy, M. A. (1993). Institutions for the earth: Sources of effective environmental protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Hileman, B. (1984). Acid rain perspectives: A tale of two countries. Environmental Science and Technology, 18, 341A-344A.
22. Ingram, H. M. (1988). State government officials' role in U.S./Mexico transboundary resource issues. Transboundary Resource Issues, 28, 431-449.
23. Kemp, D. (1990). Global environmental issues: A climatological approach. New York, NY: Routlege.
24. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
25. Lucas, A. R. (1983). Acid rain: The Canadian position. Kansas Law Review, 32, 165-179.
26. Macdonald, D. (1991). The politics of pollution: Why Canadians are failing their environment. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
27. McCormick, J. (1989). Acid earth: The global threat of acid pollution. London: World Wildlife Fund.
28. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51, 513-554.
29. Munton, D. (1981). Acid rain and basic politics. Alternatives, 10, 21-28.
30. Munton, D., & Castle, G. (1992a). The continental dimension: Canada and the United States. In R. Boardman (Ed.), Canadian environmental policy: Ecosystems, politics, and process (pp. 203-223). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
31. Munton, D., & Castle, G. (1992b). Reducing acid rain, 1980s. In D. Munton & J. Kirton (Eds.), Canadian foreign policy: Selected cases (pp. 367-381). Toronto: Prentice-Hall.
32. Nemetz, P. N., Stanbury, W. T., & Thompson, F. (1986). Social regulation in Canada: A comparison with the American model. Policy Studies Journal, 14, 580-603.
33. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42, 427-460.
35. Rabe, B. G. (1977). Power to the states: The promises and pitfalls of decentralization. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmentalism in the 1990s (3rd ed.) (pp. 31-52). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
36. Schoenbaum, T. J., & Rosenberg, R. H. (1991). Environmental policy law: Problems, cases and readings (2nd ed.). Westbury, NY: The Foundation Press.
37. Schroeer, W. L. (1990). Progress toward Canadian-U.S. acid rain control. In L. E. Susskind, E. Siskind, & J. W. Breslin (Eds.), Nine case studies in international environmental cooperation (pp. 177-198). Cambridge, MA: MIT-Harvard Public Disputes Program.
38. Schwartz, M. A. (1986). Comparing United States and Canadian public policy: A review of strategies. Policy Studies Journal, 14, 566-579.
39. Sprinz, D., & Vaahtoranta, T. (1994). The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy. International Organization, 48, 77-105.
40. Stern, B. L., Jones, M., Raizenne, M., Burnett, R., Meranger, J. C., & Franklin, C. A. (1989). Respiratory health effects associated with ambient sulfates and ozone in two rural communities. Environmental Research, 49, 20-39.
41. United States Government. (1991, March 13). Canada-United States agreement on air quality. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
42. Victor, D. G., Raustiala, K., & Skolnikoff E. B. (Eds.). (1998). The implementation and effectiveness of international environmental commitments: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Young, O. R. (1991). Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization, 45, 281-308.
44. Young, O. R. (1994). International governance: Protecting the environment in a stateless society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45. Young, O. R., & Osherenko, G. (Eds.). (1993). Polar politics: Creating international environmental regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.