Hypermnesia: The role of multiple retrieval cues

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 928-934

  Otani, Hajime ^a   Widner Jr , Robert L ^b,c   Whiteman, Howard L ^a   Louis, J Paul St ^a  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0032695595     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03198545     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BALLARD, P. B. (1913). Oblivescence and reminiscence. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplements, 1, 1-82.
2. BROWN, W. (1923). To what extent is memory measured by a single recall trial? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 377-382.
3. BURNS, D. J. (1993). Item gains and losses during hypermnesic recall: Implications for the item-specific-relational information distinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 163-173.
4. ERDELYI, M. H. (1996). The recovery of unconscious memories: Hypermnesia and reminiscence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. ERDELYI, M. H., & BECKER, J. (1974). Hypermnesia for pictures: Incremental memory for pictures but not for words in multiple recall trials. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 159-171.
6. ESTES, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review, 62, 145-154.
7. ESTES, W. K. (1959). The statistical approach to learning theory. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol 2, pp. 380-490). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. HODGE, M. H., & OTANI, H. (1996). Beyond category sorting and pleasantness rating: Inducing relational and item-specific processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 110-115.
9. HUNT, R. R., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 421-445.
10. KEPPEL, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11. KLEIN, S. B., LOFTUS, J., KIHLSTROM, J. F., & ASERON, R. (1989). Effects of item-specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1192-1197.
12. MÄNTYLÄ, T. (1986). Optimizing cue effectiveness: Recall of 500 and 600 incidentally learned words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition, 12, 66-71.
13. MARSHALL, G. R., & COFER, C. N. (1970). Single-word free association norms for 328 responses from the Connecticut cultural norms for verbal items in categories. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.), Norms of word association (pp. 321-360). New York: Academic Press.
14. MCDANIEL, M. A., MOORE, B. A., & WHITEMAN, H. L. (1998). Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: A relational/item-specific account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 173-185.
15. NAIRNE, J. S., & WIDNER, R. L., JR. (1988). Familiarity and lexicality as determinants of the generation effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 694-699.
16. OTANI, H., & HODGE, M. H. (1991). Does hypermnesia occur in recognition and cued recall? American Journal of Psychology, 104, 101-116.
17. OTANI, H., & ST. LOUIS, J. P. (1995). A further examination of relational and item-specific processing effects on cued recall hypermnesia. Journal of General Psychology, 122, 355-364.
18. OTANI, H., & WHITEMAN, H. (1994). Cued recall hypermnesia is not an artifact of response bias. American Journal of Psychology, 107, 401-421.
19. PAYNE, D. G. (1987). Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 5-27.
20. PAYNE, D. G., HEMBROOKE, H. A., & ANASATASI, J. S. (1993). Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 48-62.
21. RAAIJMAKERS, J. G., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 14, pp. 207-262). New York: Academic Press.
22. RAAIJMAKERS, J. G., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
23. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & CHALLIS, B. H. (1989). Hypermnesia: Improvements in recall with repeated testing. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on cognition (pp. 175-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. ROEDIGER, H. L., III., & PAYNE, D. G. (1982). Hypermnesia: The role of repeated testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8, 66-72.
25. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, PAYNE, D. G., GILLESPIE, G. L., & LEAN, D. S. (1982). Hypermnesia as determined by level of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 635-655.
26. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & THORPE, L. A. (1978). The role of recall time in producing hypermnesia. Memory & Cognition, 6, 296-305.
27. TOGLIA, M. P., & BATTIG, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. WIDNER, R. L., JR. (1995). Associative spread as a mediating variable in the generation effect. Memory, 3, 1-19.
29. YARMEY, A. D. (1976). Hypermnesia for pictures but not for concrete or abstract words. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 8, 115-117.