A nurse-led day case unit: One-year experience with peripheral angiography

Journal of Interventional Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 103-111

  Sanderson, E ^a   Ong, C M ^a   Worrell, M ^a   Stewart, D E ^a   Walters, H L ^a   Gishen, P ^a   Sidhu, P S ^a  

^a KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOHEXOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COST CONTROL; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NURSING; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN; SAFETY; TELEPHONE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 0032695514     PISSN: 02680882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams PS, Roub LW. Outpatient angiography and interventional radiology: safety and cost benefits. Radiology 1984; 151: 81-82.
2. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media: A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990; 175: 621-628.
3. Jewell FM, Walsh S, Murphy P, Jones AJ. Complications of day-case angiography using 5F catheters. Clinical Radiology 1995; 50: 102-104.
4. Reidy JF, Ludman C. Technical note: the safety of outpatient arteriography using 3F catheters. British Journal of Radiology 1993; 66: 1048-1049.
5. Rankin RN. Outpatient angiography. Clinical Radiology 1991; 43: 217-218.
6. Payne SPK, Stanton A, Travers P, Glenn D, Hanel KC. Outpatient angioplasty: 4-year experience in one practice. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1997; 79: 331-334.
7. Cowling MG, Buckenham TM, Belli AM. The role of transradial diagnostic angiography. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 1997; 20: 103-106.
8. Al-Kutoubi A, De Jode M, Gibson M. Radial artery approach for outpatient peripheral arteriography. Clinical Radiology 1996; 51: 110-112.
9. United Kingdom Central Council. The Scope of Professional Practice. London. UKCC. 1992.
10. National Health Service Management Executive. Junior Doctors: The new deal. London. NHSME. 1991.
11. Department of Health. Primary care: delivering the future. London. HMSO. 1996; 3512.
12. The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Guidelines for the management of surgical waiting lists. 1991.
13. Livingstone JI, Harvey M, Kitchin N, Shah N, Wastell C. Role of pre-admission clinics in a general surgical unit: a 6-month audit. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1993; 75: 211-212.
14. Ogg TW. Aspects of day surgery and anaesthesia. Anaesthesia Rounds 1985; 18: 1-24.
15. Whiteley MS, Wilmot K, Offland RB. A specialist nurse can replace pre-registration house officers in the surgical pre-admission clinic. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1997; 79: 257-260.
16. Reed M, Wright S, Armitage F. Nurse-led general surgical pre-operative assessment clinic. Journal of the College of Surgeons (Edinburgh) 1997; 42: 310-313.
17. Newton V. Care in pre-admission clinics. Nursing Times 1996; 92: 27-28.
18. Fitzgerald J, Andrew H, Conway H, Hackett S, Chalmers N. Outpatient angiography: a prospective study of 3 French catheters in unselected patients. British Journal of Radiology 1998; 71: 484-486.
19. Wolfel DA, Lovett BP, Ortenburger AI, Johnson LS, Sommerville DL. Outpatient arteriography: its safety and cost effectiveness. Radiology 1984; 153: 363-364.
20. Audit Commision. Measuring quality: the patient's view of day surgery. London. HMSO. 1991.
21. Royal College of Surgeons for England. Guidelines for day surgery. London Royal College of Surgeons. 1992.
22. West G, Terry C. Feature: nurse-led pre-admission clinics. With a view to change. Nursing Standard 1996; 10: 22-24.
23. Callaghan N, Evans J, Caldwell C. Reflections on nurse-led day care. Paediatric Nursing 1997; 9: 14-17.
24. Smith C, Price P, Abraham L. The difference day-care makes. Nursing Times 1997; 93: 25-6.
25. Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. Angioplasty standard of practice. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 1992; 3: 269-71.
26. Struck DW, Rankin RN, Eliasziw M, Vellet AD. Safety of outpatient peripheral angioplasty. Radiology 1993; 189: 193-196.
27. Rogers WF, Kraft MA. Outpatient angioplasty. Radiology 1990; 174: 753-755.
28. Gilmore IT, Burroughs A, Murray-Lyons IM et al. Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians. Gut 1995; 36: 437-441.
29. Douds AC, Joseph AEA, Finlayson C, Maxwell JD. Is day case liver biopsy underutilised? Gut 1995; 37: 574-575.
30. Janes CH, Lindor KD. Outcome of patients hospitalized for complications after outpatient liver biopsy. Annals of Internal Medicine 1993; 118: 96-98.
31. Garcia-Tsao G, Boyer JL. Outpatient liver biopsy: how safe is it? Annals of Internal Medicine 1993; 118: 150-153.
32. Bell SD, Carmody EA, Yeung EY, Thurston WA, Simons ME, Ho CS. Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy: additional experience in 519 procedures. Radiology 1995; 194: 817-820.
33. Wollman B, D'Agostino HB, Johnson D, Beale A, Clark J, Pittman C. Improvement in patient care and operational efficiency: experience with a non-vascular interventional radiology clinic. Journal of Interventional Radiology 1997; 12: 123-126.