CT of the brain: A comparison of transportable and fixed-platform scanners

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 173, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1481-1484

  Mayo Smith, William W ^a   Davis, Lawrence M ^a   Clements, Nancy C ^a,b   Cobb, Cynthia M ^a   Smith, Wendy J ^a   Tung, Glenn A ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NEURORADIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032695036     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.6.10584786     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Indeck M, Peterson S, Smith J, Brotman S. Risk, cost, and benefit of transporting ICU patients for special studies. J Trauma 1984;28:1020-1025
2. Butler WE, Piaggio CM, Constantinou C, et al. A mobile computed tomographic scanner with intraoperative and intensive care unit applications. Neurosurgery 1998;42:1304-1310
3. Okudera H, Kobayashi S, Sugita K. Mobile CT scanner gantry for use in the operating room. Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:131-132
4. Fleiss J. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981:112-119