Effects of pod infection by Mycosphaerella pinodes on yield components of pea (Pisum sativum)

Annals of Applied Biology

Volumn 135, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 359-367

  Beasse, C ^a   Ney, B ^a,b   Tivoli, B ^b  

^a INRA   (France)

^b AGROPARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

Ascochyta blight; Disease progress curve; Mycosphaerella pinodes; Pea; Pisum sativum; Yield

Indexed keywords

DISEASE MODEL; PATHOGENESIS;

FUNGAL DISEASE; PEST DAMAGE; YIELD;

ANIMALIA; ASCOCHYTA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); DIDYMELLA PINODES; FUNGI; MYCOSPHAERELLA; MYCOSPHAERELLA PINODES; PISUM SATIVUM; SATIVUM;

EID: 0032694525     PISSN: 00034746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1999.tb00862.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anon. 1987. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
2. Atkins C, Kuo J, Pate J. 1977. Photosynthetic pod wall of pea (Pisum sativum L.) distribution of carbon dioxide-fixing enzymes in relation to pod structure. Plant Physiology 60:779-786.
3. Chaillet I, Couleaud G, Duchêne E, Jouy L, Maufras J Y, Rameau C, Seguin B, Taupin P. 1996. Guide pratique de la conduite du pois protéagineux. Perspectives Agricoles 209:35-66.
4. Coïc Y, Lesaint Y. 1975. La nutrition minérale et en eau des plantes en horticulture avancée. Document Technique SCPA 23:1-22.
5. Flinn A, Pate J. 1970. A quantitative study of carbon transfer from pod and subtending leaf to the ripening seeds of the field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 21:71-82.
6. Garry G, Jeuffroy M H, Tivoli B. 1998a. Effects of Ascochyta blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes Berk. & Blox.) on biomass production, seed number and seed weight of dried-pea (Pisum sativum L.) as affected by plant growth stage and disease intensity. Annals of Applied Biology 132:49-59.
7. Garry G, Jeuffroy M H, Ney B, Tivoli B. 1998b. Effects of Ascochyta blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes Berk. and Blox.) on the decrease in photosynthesizing leaf area and the photosynthetic efficiency by green leaf area of dried-pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Pathology 47:473-479.
8. Garry G, Tivoli B, Jeuffroy M H, Citharel J. 1996. Effects of Ascochyta blight caused by Mycosphaerella pinodes on the translocation of carbohydrates and nitrogenous compounds from the leaf and hull to the seed of dried-pea. Plant Pathology 45:769-777.
9. Le Deunff Y, Rachidian Z. 1988. Interruption of water delivery at physiological maturity is essential for seed development germination and seedling growth in pea (Pisum sativum L). Journal of Experimental Botany 39:1221-1230.
10. Lucas, N A, McKenzie B A, Gaunt R E, Moot D J. 1998. Reduction in radiation interception, radiation use efficiency and photosynthetic rate in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) by Ascochyta diseases. In Abstracts of the 7th congress of Plant Pathology, Edinburgh, Scotland 9-16 August 1998. Volume 2, Abstract No. 2.8.13.
11. Maufras J Y. 1997. L'anthracnose. In Maladies du pois protéagineux, pp. 30-43. Eds ITCF and UNIP. Paris: ITCF.
12. Maurer A R, Jaffray D E, Fletcher H F. 1965. Response of peas to environnment. III Assessment of the morphological development of peas. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 46:285-290.
13. Munier-Jolain N G, Ney B. 1994. Analyse de la variabilité interannuelle du poids d'une graine chez le pois. In Agrophysiologie du pois protéagineux, pp. 111-116. Eds INRA, ITCF and UNIP. Paris, France: ITCF.
14. Ney B. 1994. Seed number per stem of pea is linearly related to its growth rate between flowering and beginning of seed filling. Compte rendu d'activité du programme Agro Industry-Research, pp. 1-4.
15. Ney B, Duthion C, Fontaine E. 1993. Timing of reproductive abortions in relation to cell division, water content, and growth of pea seeds. Crop Science 33:267-270.
16. Ney B, Duthion C, Turc O. 1994. Phenological response of peas to water stress during reproductive development. Crop Science 34:141-143.
17. Pate J, Flinn A. 1973. Carbon and nitrogen transfer from vegetative organs to ripening seeds of field pea (Pisum arvense L). Journal of Experimental Botany 24:1090-1099.
18. Pigeaire A, Duthion C, Turc O. 1986. Characterization of the final stage in seed abortion in indeterminate soybean, white lupin and pea. Agronomie 6: 371-378.
19. Rochat C, Boutin J P. 1989. Carbohydrates and nitrogenous compounds changes in the hull and in the seed during the pod development of pea. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 27:881-887.
20. Roger C, Tivoli B, Huber L. 1999. Effects of temperature and moisture on disease and fruit body development of Mycosphaerella pinodes on pea (Pisum sativum). Plant Pathology 48:1-9.
21. Sinclair T, De Witt C T. 1976. Analysis of the carbon and nitrogen limitations to soybean yield. Agronomy Journal 68:319-324.
22. Tivoli B. 1994. Conséquences des attaques parasitaires foliaires sur l'élaboration du rendement des plantes à croissance indéterminées. In Agrophysiologie du pois protéagineux, pp. 199-219. Eds INRA, ITCF and UNIP. Paris, France: ITCF.
23. Tivoli B, Lemarchand E. 1992. Fungal and bacterial foliar disease survey of combining pea in France in 1991. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Grain Legumes, Angers, France, pp. 363-364.
24. Tivoli B, Béasse C, Lemarchand E, Masson E. 1996. Effect of Ascochyta blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes) on yield component of single pea (Pisum sativum) under field conditions. Annals of Applied Biology 129:207-216.
25. Werker A R, Gilligan C A, Hornby D. 1991. Analysis of disease-progress curves for take-all in consecutive crops of winter wheat. Plant Pathology 40:8-24
26. Xue A G, Warkentin T D, Kenashuk E O.1997. Effects of timing of inoculation with Mycosphaerella pinodes on yield and seed infection of field pea. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 77:685-689.