Brief hypnosis substitutes for alprazolam use in college students: Transient experiences and quantitative eeg responses

American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 262-268

  Nishith, Pallavi ^a,b   Barabasz, Arreed ^a   Barabasz, Marianne ^a   Warner, Dennis ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPRAZOLAM; SEDATIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; RELAXATION TRAINING; SUGGESTION;

ADULT; ALPRAZOLAM; ANTI-ANXIETY AGENTS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; STUDENTS; SUGGESTION; TIME FACTORS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 0032692671     PISSN: 00029157     EISSN: 21600562     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00029157.1999.10404217     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barabasz, A. F. & Barabasz, M. (1992). Research designs and considerations. In E. Fromm & M. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary Hypnosis Research (pp. 173-200). NY: Guilford.
2. Barabasz, A., Barabasz, M., Jensen, S., Calvin, S., Trevisan, M., and Warner, D. (1999). Cortical event related potentials show the structure of hypnotic suggestions is crucial, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 5-20.
3. Barber, T. X. (1970). LSD. Marihuana. Yoga. and Hypnosis. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
4. Bauman, F. (1970). Hypnosis and the adolescent drug abuser. The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 13, (1), 17-21.
5. Blount, A. (1998). Integrated primary care: The future of medical and mental health collaboration. New York: Norton.
6. Crawford, H.J., & Gruzelier, J.H. (1992). A midstream view of the neuropsychophysiology of hypnosis: Recent research and future directions. In E. Fromm & M. Nash (Eds.). Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 227-266). NY: Guilford.
7. Eichman, W. J., & Umstead, J. (1971). Profile of Mood States. The Eighth Mental Measurements Yearbook, 1015-1019.
8. Greenwald, H. (1966). Hypnosis and hallucinogenic drugs. Journal of the Long Island Consultation Center, 4, 1-6.
9. Kumar, R., Mac, D. S., Gabrielli, W. F., & Goodwin, D. W. (1987). Anxiolytics and memory: a comparison of lorazepam and alprazolam. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48,158-160.
10. Linnoila, M., Stapleton, J. M., Lister, R., Moss, H., Lane, E., Granger, A., & Eckardt, M. J. (1990). Effects of single doses of alprazolam and diazepam. Alone and in combination with ethanol, on psychomotor and cognitive performance and on autonomic nervous system reactivity in healthy volunteers. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 39, 21-28.
11. Ludwig, A. M., & Lyle, W. H. Jr. (1964). The experimental production of narcotic drug effects and withdrawal symptoms through hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 12, 1-17.
12. Meddis, S.V. (1994, May 12) Nation's drug scene again degenerating. USA Today, p.3A
13. Morgan, A. H., & Hilgard, J. R. (1975). Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale (SHCS). In E. R. Hilgard & J. R. Hilgard, Hypnosis in the relief of pain. Los Altos: Kaufman.
14. Physicians Desk Reference.(1991). Oradell, NJ: Medical Economics Data Corp.
15. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists
16. Tart, C. T. (1969). Altered states of consciousness. NY: Wiley.
17. Thoreson, C. E., & Eagleston, J. R. (1985). Counseling for health. Counseling Psychologist, 13, 15-87.
18. Ulett, G. A., Akpinar, S., & Itil, T. M., & Fakuda, T. (1971). The neurophysiological basis of hypnosis-objective techniques. Folia Psychiatrica et Neurilogica Japónica, 25, (3), 203-211.
19. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.
20. Wilfley, D. & Kunce, J. (1986) Differential physical and psychological effects of exercise. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 33, 337-342.