Analysis of hypersingular residual error estimates in boundary element methods for potential problems

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 173, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 449-473

  Menon, Govind ^a   Paulino, Glaucio H ^b   Mukherjee, Subrata ^c  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; ITERATIVE METHODS;

ERROR ESTIMATION;

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 0032688898     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00297-7     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. [1] P.K. Banerjee, The Boundary Element Methods in Engineering, 2nd edition (McGraw Hill, London, 1994).
2. [2] W.L. Wendland, Strongly elliptic boundary integral equations, in: A. Iserles and M.J.D. Powell, eds., The State of the Art in Numerical Analysis, Vol. 9 of New Series (Oxford University Press, 1987) 511-562.
3. [3] G. Krishnasamy, F.J. Rizzo and T.J. Rudolphi, Hypersingular boundary integral equations: Their occurrence, interpretation, regularization and computation, in: P.K. Banerjee and S. Kobayashi, eds., Developments in Boundary Element Methods, Vol. 7, Chap. 6 (Elsevier Applied Science, London and New York, 1992) 207-252.
4. [4] M. Tanaka, V. Sladek and J. Sladek, Regularization techniques applied to boundary element methods, Appl. Mech. Rev. 47(10) (1994) 457-499 (cites 350 references).
5. [5] G.H. Paulino, Novel formulations of the boundary element method for fracture mechanics and error estimation, Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, 1995.
6. [6] G.H. Paulino, L.J. Gray and V. Zarikian, Hypersingular residuals - A new approach for error estimation in the boundary element method, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 39(12) (1996) 2005-2029.
7. [7] G. Menon, Hypersingular error estimates in boundary element methods, Master's Thesis, Cornell University, 1996.
8. [8] P.G. Ciarlet, Basic error estimates for elliptic problems, in: P.G. Ciarlet and J.L. Lions, eds., Finite Element Methods (Part 1), Vol. 2 of Handbook of Numerical Analysis (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1991).
9. [9] K. Eriksson, D. Estep, P. Hansbo and C. Johnson, Introduction to adaptive methods for differential equations, in: A. Iserles, ed., Acta Numerica 1995, Chap. 3 (Cambridge University Press, 1995) 105-158.
10. [10] I.H. Sloan, Error analysis in boundary integral methods, in: A. Iserles, ed., Acta Numerica 1992, Chap. 7 (Cambridge University Press, 1992) 287-339.
11. [11] E. Kita and N. Kamiya, Recent studies on adaptive boundary element methods, Adv. Engrg. Software 19 (1994) 21-32.
12. [12] S. Liapis, A review of error estimation and adaptivity in the boundary element method, Engrg. Anal. Boundary Elem. 14(4) (1995) 315-323.
13. [13] G.H. Paulino, F. Shi, S. Mukherjee and P. Ramesh, Nodal sensitivities as error estimates in computational mechanics, Acta Mech. 121(1-4) (1997) 191-213.
14. [14] E. Rank, Adaptive h-, p-and hp-versions for boundary integral element methods, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 28(6) (1989) 1335-1349.
15. [15] W.L. Wendland and D.-H. Yu, Adaptive boundary element methods for strongly elliptic integral equations, Numer. Math. 53 (1988) 539-558.
16. [16] W.L. Wendland and D.-H. Yu, A posteriori local error estimates of boundary element methods with some pseudo-differential equations on closed curves, J. Comput. Math. 10(3) (1992) 273-289.
17. [17] D.-H. Yu, A posteriori error estimates and adaptive approaches for some boundary element methods, in: C. Brebbia, W.L. Wendland and G. Kuhn, eds, Mathematical and Computational Aspects, Vol. 1 of Boundary Elements IX (Computational Mechanics Publications, Springer-Verlag, 1987) 241-256.
18. [18] D.-H. Yu, Self-adaptive boundary element methods, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 68(5) (1988) T435-T437.
19. [19] C. Carstensen, Adaptive boundary element methods and adaptive finite element methods and boundary element coupling, in: M. Costabel, M. Dauge and S. Nicaise, eds., Boundary Value Problems and Integral Equations in Nonsmooth Domains (Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1995) 47-58.
20. [20] C. Carstensen, Efficiency of a posteriori BEM error estimates for first kind integral equations on quasi-uniform meshes, Math. Comput. 65(213) (1996) 69-84.
21. [21] C. Carstensen and E.P. Stephan, A posteriori error estimates for boundary element methods, Math. Comput. 64(210) (1995) 483-500.
22. [22] C. Carstensen, D. Estep and P. Stephan, h-adaptive boundary element schemes, Comput. Mech. 15(4) (1995) 372-383.
23. [23] W.L. Wendland, E.P. Stephan and G.C. Hsiao, On the integral equation method for the plane mixed boundary value problem for the Laplacian, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 1 (1979) 265-321.
24. [24] M. Costabel and E. Stephan, Boundary integral equations for mixed boundary value problems in polygonal domains and Galerkin approximation, in: W. Fiszdon and K. Wilmanski, eds., Mathematical Models and Methods in Mechanics, Vol. 15 (Banach Center Publications, 1985).
25. [25] M. Costabel, M. Dauge and S, Nicaise, eds., Boundary Value Problems and Integral Equations in Nonsmooth Domains, number 167 in Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics (Marcel Dekker Inc., 1995).
26. [26] E.P. Stephan, The h-p boundary element method for solving 2-and 3-dimensional problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 133(3-4) (1996) 183-208.
27. [27] M. Feistauer, G.C. Hsiao and R.E. Kleinman, Asymptotic and a posteriori error estimates for boundary element solutions of hypersingular integral equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33(2) (1996) 666-685.
28. [28] M.A. Golberg and H. Bowman, Superconvergence and the use of the residual as an error estimator in the BEM - I: Theoretical development, Boundary Elem. Comm. 8(4) (1998) 230-238.
29. [29] I.H. Sloan, Improvement by iteration for compact operator equations, Math. Comput. 30 (1976) 758-764.
30. [30] I.H. Sloan, Superconvergence, in: M.A. Golberg, ed., Numerical Solution of Integral Equations, Chap. 2 (Plenum Press, New York, 1990) 35-70.
31. [31] O.D. Kellog, Potential Theory (Dover Publications, 1967).
32. [32] S.G. Mikhlin, Integral Equations (Pergamon Press, 1957).
33. [33] R. Kress, Linear Integral Equations (Springer-Verlag, 1989).
34. [34] L.J. Gray, Symbolic computation of hypersingular boundary integrals, in: J.H. Kane, G. Maier, N. Tosaka and S.N. Atluri, eds., Advances in Boundary Element Techniques (Springer-Verlag, 1993) 157-172.
35. [35] D. Rosen and D.E. Cormack, Singular and near singular integrals in the BEM: A global approach, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 53(2) (1993) 340-357.
36. [36] G. Krishnasamy, F.J. Rizzo and T.J. Rudolphi, Continuity requirements for density functions in the boundary element method, Comput. Mech. 9(4) (1992) 267-284.
37. [37] P.A. Martin and F.J. Rizzo, Hypersingular integrals: how smooth must the density be? Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 39(4) (1996) 687-704.
38. [38] T.A. Cruse and J.D. Richardson, Self-regularized gradient potential formulation. Report 98-01, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA, 1998.
39. [39] K.O. Friedrichs, Pseudo-differential Operators. Courant Institute of Mathematics, Lecture Notes, 1970.
40. [40] D.-H. Yu, Numerical solutions of harmonic and biharmonic canonical integral equations in interior or exterior circular domains, J. Comput. Math. 1 (1983) 52-62.
41. [41] G. Chen and J. Zhou, Boundary Element Methods (Academic Press, 1992).
42. 3, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 31(5) (1994) 1265-1288.
43. [43] L.F. Martha, L.J. Gray and A.R. Ingraffea, Three-dimensional fracture simulation with a single-domain direct boundary element formulation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 35(9) (1992) 1907-1921.
44. [44] M. Guiggiani, Hypersingular integral equations and superaccurate stress evaluation, in: C.A. Brebbia and J.J. Rencis, eds., Fluid Flow and Computational Aspects, Vol. 1 of Boundary Elements XV (Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, and Elsevier Science Publishers, London, 1993) 413-428.
45. [45] L.B. Wahlbin, Local behavior in finite element methods, in: P.G. Ciarlet and J.L. Lions, eds., Finite Element Methods (Part 1), Vol. 2 of Handbook of Numerical Analysis (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1991).
46. [46] F. Hartmann, C. Katz and B. Protopsaltis, Boundary elements and symmetry, Ingenieur-Archiv. 55(6) (1985) 440-449.
47. [47] S. Sirtori, G. Maier, G. Novati and S. Miccoli, A Galerkin symmetric boundary-element method in elasticity: formulation and implementation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 35 (1992) 255-282.
48. [48] G.H. Paulino and L.J. Gray, Galerkin residuals for adaptive Galerkin-boundary element methods, ASCE J. Engrg. Mech., in press.
49. [49] D. Porter and D.S.G. Stirling, Integral Equations: A Practical Treatment, from Spectral Theory to Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).
50. [50] F. Chatelin and B. Lebbar, Superconvergence results for the iterated projection method applied to a Fredholm integral equation of the second kind and the corresponding eigenvalue problem, J. Integral Eqns. 6 (1984) 71-91.
51. [51] I.G. Graham, S. Joe and I.H. Sloan, Iterated Galerkin versus iterated collocation for integral equations of the second kind, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 5 (1985) 355-369.
52. [52] T. Tran, The K-operator and the Galerkin method for strongly elliptic equations on smooth curves: local estimates, Math. Comput. 64(210) (1995) 501-513.