Quantitative modeling for the interactive simulation of software projects

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 113-122

  Drappa, A ^a   Ludewig, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; COMPUTER HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE;

MODEL DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE; QUALITY ASSURANCE MODEL; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING SIMULATION BY ANIMATED MODELS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0032686668     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0164-1212(99)00005-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Abdel-Hamid, T.K., Madnick, S.E., 1991. Software Project Dynamics. An Integrated Approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2. Boehm, B.W., 1981. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Brooks, F.P., 1974. The Mythical Man-Month. Datamation, pp. 44-52.
4. Drappa, A., Deininger, M., Ludewig, J., 1995. Modeling and simulation of software projects. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Software Engineering Workshop. Greenbelt, MD, USA, pp. 269-275.
5. International Function Point Users Group (IFPUG), 1994. Function Point Counting Practices Manual, Release 4.0.
6. Jones, C., 1996. Applied Software Measurement, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
7. Madachy, R., 1996. System dynamics modeling of an inspection-based process. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering. Berlin, Germany, pp. 376-386.
8. Melchisedech R., Deininger M., Drappa A. SESAM: A software engineering education tool based on graph grammars. Bulletin of the European association for theoretical computer science (EATCS). 58:1996;198-221.
9. Möller, K.H., Paulish, D.J., Software-Metriken in der Praxis. Oldenbourg, München, 1993, in German.
10. Porter A.A., Siy H.P., Toman C.A. An experiment to assess the cost-benefits of code inspections in large scale software development. IEEE transactions on software engineering. 23(6):1997;329-346.
11. Pressman, R.S., 1997. Software engineering - A practitioner's approach, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
12. Sackman H., Erikson W.J., Grant E.E. Exploratory experimental studies comparing online and offline programming performance. Communications of the ACM. 11(1):1968;3-11.
13. Scacchi, W., Experience with software process simulation and modeling. In: Proceedings of the software process simulation modeling workshop (ProSim '98). June 1998, Silver Falls (OR), USA, 1998.
14. Weller E.F. Lessons from three years of inspection data. IEEE software. 10(5):1993;38-45.