Design condition for incorporating human judgement into monitoring systems

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 251-258

  Tanaka, K ^a   Klir, G J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO COMMUNICATIONS   (Japan)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INSPECTION; MONITORING; SENSORS;

AUTOMATIC MONITORING SYSTEM; DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY; HUMAN MACHINE COOPERATIVE MONITORING SYSTEM; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

SECURITY SYSTEMS;

EID: 0032670545     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0951-8320(99)00007-1     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Henley E.J., Kumamoto H. Designing for reliability and safety control. 1985;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
2. Phillips M.J. K-out-of-n:G systems are preferable. IEEE Trans. Reliability. R29-2:1980;166-169.
3. Tanaka K. Reliable design of safety monitoring system accounting for the uncertainty zone. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 48-2:1995;75-84.
4. Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. 1976;Princeton University Press, Princeton.
5. Tanaka K., Klir G.J. A design method for incorporating human judgement into monitoring systems. Sheridan T. Analysis Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems 1995. 1996;717-722 Pergamon, Oxford.
6. Klir G.J., Wierman M.A. Uncertainty-based information: elements of generalized information theory. 1998;Physica-Verlag/Springer, Heidelberg/New York.
7. Inagaki T. Interdependence between safety control policy and multiple-sensor schemes via Dempster-Shafer theory. IEEE Trans. Reliability. R40-2:1991;182-188.
8. Yager R.R. On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules. Information Sciences. 41:1987;93-137.