Answering the call: The history of political and social concepts in english

History of European Ideas

Volumn 25, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 15-22

  Armitage, David ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032668116     PISSN: 01916599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-6599(99)00016-9     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. K.M. Elisabeth Murray, Caught in the Web of Words: James A.H. Murray and the Oxford English Dictionary, New Haven, 1977, p. 188.
2. M. Richter, The History of Political and Social Concepts: A Critical Introduction, New York, 1995, p. 147.
3. O. Brunner, W. Conze, R. Koselleck (Eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, 8 Vols., Stuttgart, 1972-1993.
4. H. Aarsleff, The original plan for the OED and its background, in: R.W. Burchfield, and H. Aarsleff (Eds.), The Oxford English Dictionary and the State of the Language, Washington, DC, 1988, pp. 42-43.
5. J.W. Burrow, The uses of philology in Victorian England, In: R. Robson (Ed.), Ideas and Institutions in Victorian England: Essays in Honour of George Kitson Clark, London, 1967, pp. 180-204.
6. J. Willinsky, Empire of Words: The Reign of The OED, Princeton, 1994, pp. 5, 53, 200, 202.
7. J. Schäfer, Documentation in the OED: Shakespeare and Nashe as Test Cases, Oxford, 1980.
8. A. Rynell, Antedatings and Additions for OED from the Catalogue of Prints of Political and Personal Satire in the British Museum, Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Vol. 72, Stockholm, 1987.
9. P. Harling, The Waning of "Old Corruption": The Politics of Economical Reform in Britain, 1779-1846, Oxford, 1996.
10. J.G.A. Pocock, Concepts and Discourses: A Difference in Culture? in: H. Lehmann, M. Richter (Eds.), The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, German Historical Institute, Washington, D.C., Occasional Papers, 15, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 56-57.
11. J.C.D. Clark, English Society 1688-1832: Ideology, Social Structure and Political Practice during the Ancien Regime, Cambridge, 1985, pp. 408-420.
12. C. Pigott, A Political Dictionary: Explaining the True Meanings of Words, London, 1795.
13. R. DeMaria Jr., The Politics of Johnson's Dictionary, Publications of the Modern Languages Association of America, Vol. 104, 1989, pp. 64-74.
14. O. Smith, The Politics of Language, 1791-1819, Oxford, 1984.
15. P.J. Corfield, Class by name and number in eighteenth-century Britain, History 72 (1987) 39.
16. H.M. Höpfl, Isms, British Journal of Political Science 13 (1983) 7.
17. N. Henshall, The Myth of Absolutism: Change and Continuity in Early Modern European Monarchy, London, 1992, pp. 207-210.
18. J.H. Merryman, The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America, 2nd Edition, Stanford, 1985.
19. M. Richardson, V. Henry, English Chancery, and Chancery English, Speculum 55 (1980) 726-750.
20. K. Tribe, The Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe project: From history of ideas to conceptual history, Comparative Studies in Society and History 31 (1989) 180.
21. J.G.A. Pocock, The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century: A Reissue with a Retrospect, Cambridge, 1987.
22. D. Kelley, Historians and Law in Postrevolutionary France, Princeton, 1984.
23. T. Hobbes, in: R. Tuck (Ed.), Leviathan (1651), rev. Edition Cambridge, 1996, p. 14.
24. J. Bentham, Anarchical fallacies (1792), in: J. Waldron (Ed.), Nonsense Upon Stilts: Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man, London, 1987, p. 53.
25. Hobbes, A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England (1666), in: J. Cropsey (Ed.), Chicago, 1971.
26. Bentham, A Fragment on Government (1776), R. Harrison (Ed.), Cambridge, 1988.
27. D.L. Emblen, Peter Mark Roget: The Word and the Man, New York, 1970, pp. 49-53.
28. P.M. Roget, Introduction (1852), in: R.A. Dutch (Ed.), Roget's Thesaurus, London, 1962, p. xxvi, xxxiv.
29. J. Trusler, The Difference Between Words, Esteemed Synonymous, in the English Language, London, 1766.
30. H.L. Piozzi, British Synonymy: Or, an Attempt at Regulating the Choice of Words in Familiar Conversation, 2 Vols, Paris, 1804.
31. J. Trusler, Modern Times, or, the Adventures of Gabriel Outcast, 3 Vols, London, 1785, I, p. 135.
32. R. Reichardt, E. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbuch politisch-sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich, 1680-1820, 10 Vols, so far, Munich, 1985-1999.
33. P.P. Wiener (Ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas, New York, 1973.
34. J.W. Scott, Gender: A useful category of historical analysis, in: Scott (Ed.), Gender and the Politics of History, New York, 1988, pp. 28-50.
35. U. Spree, Die verhinderte bürgerin, in: R. Koselleck, K. Schreiner (Eds.), BüRgerschaft: Rezeption und Innovation der Begrifflichkeit vom Hohen Mittelalter bis ins 19. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart, 1984, 309-374.
36. I. Hannaford, Race: The History of an Idea in the West, Washington, DC, 1996.
37. D. Wahrman, Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain c. 1780-1840, Cambridge, 1995.
38. T. Laqueur, Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
39. D. Wahrman, Percy's prologue: From gender play to gender panic in eighteenth-century England, Past and Present (159) (1998) 113-160.
40. M. Freeden, Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach, Oxford, 1996, pp. 117-123.
41. Q. Skinner, A reply to my critics, in: J. Tully (Ed.), Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Princeton, 1988, pp. 260-263.
42. G.S. Jones, Languages of Class: Studies in English Working Class History 1832-1982, Cambridge, 1983.
43. J. W. Scott, On language, gender and working-class history, in: Scott (Ed.), Gender and the Politics of History, pp. 53-67.
44. D. Mayfield, S. Thorne, Social history and its discontents: Gareth Stedman Jones and the politics of language, Social History 17 (1992) 165-188.
45. M. Jay, Should intellectual history take a linguistic turn? Reflections on the Habermas-Gadamer debate, in: D. LaCapra, S.L. Kaplan (Eds.), Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives, Ithaca, 1982, pp. 86-110.
46. J. Toews, Intellectual history after the linguistic turn: The autonomy of meaning and the irreducibility of experience, American Historical Review 92 (1987) 879-907.
47. D.R. Kelley, Horizons of intellectual history: Retrospect, circumspect, prospect, Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1987) 321-326.
48. T. Ball, J. Farr, R.L. Hanson (Eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge, 1989.
49. D. Crystal, English as a Global Language, Cambridge, 1997, pp. 53-54.
50. R. Walther, Economic liberalism, Economy and Society 13 (1984) 178-207 (GG, III, 787-815).