Computer graphics for art creation: Cultural biases against its acceptance in education

Computers and Graphics (Pergamon)

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 419-427

  Mak, Brenda L ^a   Degennaro, Al ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b Cleveland State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; EDUCATION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS;

ART EDUCATION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 0032665412     PISSN: 00978493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0097-8493(99)00049-7     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Sims D. Computer art that isn't. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 14:1994;4-6.
2. Machover C. Computer art. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 1995:4-6.
3. Hays N. Art and science converge. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 13:1993;9-12.
4. Hays N. An artist thanks to the medium. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 14:1994;4-7.
5. Hays N. Layers of meaning. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 15:1995;6-8.
6. Sheridan G. Technologic. the European view of the computer Print. 50:1996;156-161.
7. Jacob O. Computer graphics story: A personal overview of computer animation in the movies. Computer Graphics. 31:1997;26-28.
8. Fechter J., Grunert T., Encarnacao L.M., Strasser W. User-centered development of medical visualization applications: flexible interaction through communicating application objects. Computers and Graphics. 20:1996;763-774.
9. Sandler E.A., Gusev D.A., Milman G.Y. Hybrid algorithms for digital halftoning and their application to medical imaging. Computers and Graphics. 21:1997;69-78.
10. Li L. Animation of stochastic motion of 3-D cloth objects. Computers and Graphics. 21:1997;769-775.
11. Gibbs W.W. Artificial art. Scientific American. 273:1995;34.
12. Manovich L. The engineering of vision and the aesthetics of computer art. Computer Graphics. 28:1994;259-263.
13. Sims D. On the eve of an art revolution. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 14:1994;7-9.
14. Goodman G. Digital visions: computers and art; New York: H.N. Abrams; Syracuse, 1987.
15. Meltzer B. Computers should be seen as artist's tools, rather than enemies of the arts. PC Week. 5:1988;33.
16. Noel Jr L. The new renaissance: the computer in fine arts. Compute. 13:1991;16-21.
17. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed:1995;Free Press, New York.
18. Machover C. Four decades of computer graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 14:1994;14-19.
19. Mueller R.E. When is computer art art? Creative Computing. 9:1983;136-141.
20. Emmett A. Computers and fine arts: computer art struggles for acceptance in a conservative art world. Computer Graphics World. 11:1988;68-74.
21. Frank P. Art and the computer: keystroking, mousing and joysticking. Art News. 95:1996;96-105.
22. Noll M.A. The beginnings of computer art in the united states: a memoir. Leonardo. 27:1994;39-44.
23. Haggerty M. Computer painting in a different light. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 12:1992;4-6.
24. Hershman L. Touch-sensitivity and other forms of subversion: interactive artwork. Leonardo. 26:1993;431-436.
25. Hansmann W. A survey of computer graphics in art education in Germany. Computers and Graphics. 21:1997;117-119.
26. Teixeira J.C. Environments for teaching computer graphics: an experience. Computers and Graphics. 20:1996;927-935.
27. Radai Y. Computer art from the Mandelbrot set. Computers and Graphics. 20:1996;925-926.
28. Thurmer R. In an interview conducted at Cleveland State University by Al Degennaro, 1997.
29. Reiser H., Reiser B. Aesthetic considerations unique to interactive media. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 15:1995;24-28.
30. World L. Advancing traditions. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 15:1995;5-7.
31. Lehman J., Murthy S. Business graphics trends, two years later. Information and Management. 16:1989;57-69.
32. Wilson V.E., Addo T.B.A. An investigation of the relative presentation efficiency of computer-displayed graphs. Information and Management. 26:1994;105-115.
33. Wilson S. Synthesis, visual arts in the electronic culture. Leonardo. 24:1991;241.
34. Wilson S. The aesthetics of intelligent systems design. IEEE Expert. 12:1997;11-12.
35. Gold R. No information without representation. IEEE Expert. 12:1997;6-8.
36. Nadin M. Emergent aesthetics, aesthetic issues in computer arts. Leonardo Supp. 1988: 43-48.
37. Hays N. Art under observation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 15:1995;4-6.
38. Whitehouse K. An artist in programmer's clothing. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 15:1995;4-6.
39. Lear A. Exploring synthetic possibilities of virtual space. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 16:1996;4-5.
40. Whitehouse K. Pictures worth more than a thousand words. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 15:1995;4-6.
41. Whitehouse K. Art without pretense. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 15:1995;4-5.
42. Haggerty M. Translating mathematics and icons into art. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 14:1994;7-9.
43. Lucas A. Art, science and technology in an expanded field. Leonardo. 26:1993;335-345.
44. Gould J. How to design usable systems (Excerpt). Baecker R.M., Grudin J., Buxto W.A.S., Greenberg S. Human-Computer Interaction. Toward the Year 2000:1995;93-121 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc, Los Altos, CA.
45. Doll W.J., Torkzadeh G. A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement. Management Science. 35:1989;1151-1171.
46. Igbaria M., Meredith G., Smith D.C. Predictors of intention of IS professionals to stay with the organization in South Africa. Information and Management. 26:1994;245-256.