Case-based reasoning for real-time traffic flow management

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 347-356

  Sadek, Adel W ^a   Demetsky, Michael J ^b   Smith, Brian L ^b  

^a VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HEURISTIC METHODS; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MACHINE ORIENTED LANGUAGES; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

CASE-BASED REASONING (CBR); DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT (DTA);

HIGHWAY ENGINEERING;

EID: 0032661424     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0885-9507.00153     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aamodt, A. & Plaza, E., Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations and system approaches, AI Communications, 7(1) (1992), 39-59.
2. Carey, M., Optimal time-varying flows on congested networks, Operations Research, 35(1) (1987), 58-69.
3. COMSIS Corporation, Hampton Roads Crossing Study. Compendium of Technical Traffic Information. Prepared for the Virginia Department of Transportation, 1996.
4. Cunningham, P., Smith, B. & Hurley, N., On the use of CBR in optimization problems such as the TSP, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Sesimbra, Portugal, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, pp. 401-10.
5. Friesz, T. L., Luque, J., Tobin, R. & Wie, B. W., Dynamic network traffic assignment considered as a continuous time optimal control problem, Operations Research, 37(6) (1989), 893-901.
6. Gupta, A., Maslanka, V. J. & Spring, G. S., Development of prototype knowledge-based expert system for managing congestion on Massachusetts Turnpike, Transportation Research Record 1358, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1992, pp. 60-6.
7. Ho, J. K., A successive linear optimization approach to the dynamic traffic assignment problem, Transportation Science, 14(4) (1980), 295-305.
8. Madanat, S. M., Hu, S. & Krogmeier, J. V., Dynamic estimation and prediction of freeway origin-destination matrices with route switching consideration and time dependent model parameters, Transportation Research Record 1537, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 98-105.
9. Mahmassani, H. S., Peeta, S., Hu, T. & Ziliaskopoulos, A., Dynamic traffic assignment with multiple-user classes for real-time ATIS/ATMS applications, in Proceedings of the Advanced Traffic Management Conference, St. Petersburg, Florida, 1993, pp. 91-113.
10. Merchant, D. K. & Nemhauser, G. L., A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problem, Transportation Science, 12(3) (1978), 183-99.
11. Papageorgiou, M., Dynamic modeling, assignment and route guidance in traffic networks, Transportation Research, 24B(6) (1990), 471-95.
12. Ritchie, S. G. & Presser, N. A., Real-time expert system approach to freeway incident management, Transportation Research Record 1320, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1991, pp. 7-16.
13. Sadek, A. W., Smith, B. L. & Demetsky, M. J., A pragmatic approach to the dynamic traffic assignment problem, paper submitted for the 77th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC, 1997.
14. Sadek, A. W., Smith, B. L. & Demetsky, M. J., An artificial intelligence-based architecture for real-time traffic flow management, paper submitted for the 77th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC, 1997.
15. Smith, B. L. & Demetsky, M. J., Short-term traffic flow prediction: Neural network approach, Transportation Research Record 1453, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1994, pp. 98-104.
16. Smith, B. L. & Demetsky, M. J., Multiple-interval freeway traffic flow forecasting, Transportation Research Record 1554, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 136-41.
17. Van Aerde, M. & Yagar, S., Dynamic integrated freeway/traffic signal networks: A routing-based modeling approach, Transportation Research, 22A(6) (1988), 435-43.
18. Watson, I., The case for case-based reasoning, in Proceedings of the First United Kingdom Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, Salford, U.K., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, pp. 1-16.
19. Wettschereck, D. & Aha, D., Weighting features, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Sesimbra, Portugal, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, pp. 347-58.