Symmetric schemes, time reversal symmetry and conservative methods for Hamiltonian systems

Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 257-274

  Aceto, Lidia ^a   Trigiante, Donato ^a  

^a Dipartimento di Energetica S Stecco   (Italy)

Author keywords

Boundary value method; Hamiltonian problem; Symmetric multistep method

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; EQUIVALENCE CLASSES; INTEGRATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS; SYMMETRIC MULTISTEP METHOD; TIME REVERSAL SYMMETRY;

LINEAR SYSTEMS;

EID: 0032659737     PISSN: 03770427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00093-X     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Brugnano L. Essentially symplectic boundary value methods for linear Hamiltonian systems. J. Comput. Math. 19:1997;233-254.
2. L. Brugnano, Is symplecticness sufficient for approximating Hamiltonian systems? Non-linear Differential Equations Appl. 3, 1-2 (1997) 39-48.
3. Brugnano L., Trigiante D. Block boundary value methods for linear Hamiltonian systems. Appl. Math. Comput. 81:1997;49-68.
4. L. Brugnano, D. Trigiante, Solving Differential Problems by Multistep Initial and Boundary Value Methods, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1998.
5. Cano B., Sanz-Serna J.M. Error growth in the numerical integration of periodic orbits by multistep methods, with application to reversible systems. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 18:1998;57-75.
6. Dahlquist G. A special stability problem for linear multistep methods. BIT. 3:1963;27-43.
7. Eirola T., Sanz-Serna J.M. Conservation of integrals and symplectic structure in the integration of differential equations by multistep methods. Numer. Math. 61:1992;281-290.
8. McLachlan R.I., Quispel G.R., Turner G.S. Numerical integrators that preserve symmetries and reversing symmetries. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35(2):1998;586-599.
9. J.M. Sanz-Serna, M.P. Calvo, Numerical Hamiltonian Problems, Chapman & Hall, London, 1994.
10. A.M. Stuart, Dynamical Systems and Numerical Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
11. Suris Yu.B. The Canonicity of mappings generated by Runge-Kutta type methods when integrating the systems. ẍ=-∂ U / ∂ x U.S.S.R. Comput. Maths. Math. Phys. 29(1):1989;138-144.
12. D. Trigiante, Multipoint methods for linear Hamiltonian systems, in: Advances in Nonlinear Dynamics, series "Stability and Control: Theory Methods and Applications", Gordon and Breach, Reading, UK, 1997, pp. 335-348.