Application of coupled brittle-ductile model to study correlation between Charpy energy and fracture toughness values

Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 57-80

  Folch, L C A ^a   Burdekin, F M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRITTLE FRACTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DUCTILITY; ENERGY ABSORPTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; STRAIN; STRAIN RATE; STRESSES; TEMPERATURE;

BEREMIN MODEL; CHARPY ENERGY; COUPLED BRITTLE DUCTILE MODEL; DUCTILE TEARING; LEMAITRE MODEL; PLASTIC STRAIN; STRAIN RATE EFFECTS;

STEEL;

EID: 0032656496     PISSN: 00137944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7944(99)00009-0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hodgson J., Boyd G.M. Brittle fracture in welded ships. Inst Naval Archit. 100:(3):1958;141-180.
2. Shank ME. A critical survey of brittle failure in carbon plate steel structures other than ships. Welding Research Council Bulletin, No. 17, 1954.
3. IC and Charpy V-notch test results in the transition-temperature range. Impact Testing of Metals. ASTM STP 466:1970;281-302, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
4. Marandet B, Sanz G. Etude par la mecanique de la rupture de la tenacite d'aciers a resistance moyenne fournis en forte epaisseur. Rev Metall 1976;359-383.
5. Wallin K. New improved methodology for selecting Charpy toughness criteria for thin high strength steels. Report presented to Commission X, IIW 1994 Annual Assembly, Beijing, IIW DOC. NO. X-1290-94, 1994.
6. Phaal R, MacDonald KA, Brown PA. Correlation between fracture toughness and Charpy impact energy. TWI Report, The Weld Institute, December 1994.
7. Ortner SR, Gibson GP, Wall M, Lane CE, Capel M, Druce SG. Heat treatment effects on the fracture toughness transition properties of the BPL A508 Class 3 steel forging. AEA Technology, AEA-TRS-4071, AEA Thermal Reactor Services, January 1991.
8. ABAQUS standard user's manuals, version 5.5. Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorenson Inc, 1995.
9. Beremin F.M. A local criterion for cleavage fracture of a nuclear pressure vessel steel. Metall Trans A. 14:1983;2277.
10. Lemaitre J. A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Technol. 107:1985;83.
11. Folch LCA. Application of the local damage mechanics approach to transition temperature behaviour in steels. PhD. Thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, UMIST, Manchester, 1997.
12. Gurson AL. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth. Part I - yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME, 1977;
13. Ainsworth RA, O'Dowd NP. A framework for including constraint effects in the failure assessment diagram approach for fracture assessment. Report for TAGSI, TAGSI/FSG(94)P62, 1994.
14. Hadley I. The use of the elastic T-stress and other constraint parameters in fracture mechanics. TWI Report, The Weld Institute. Abington, Cambridge: Abington Publishing, 1995.
15. Hancock JW, Karstensen AD, MacLennan IJ, Nekkal A. Constraint estimation. Advances in Fracture Mechanics, TAGSI Symposium, Abington, Cambridge, January 1996.
16. O'Dowd N.P., Shih C.F. Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter - II. fracture applications. J Mech Phys Solids. 40:(5):1992;939-963.
17. Sherry A.H., France C.C., Goldthorpe M.R. Compendium of T-stress solutions for two and three dimensional cracked geometries. Fract Engng Mater Struct. 18:(1):1995;141-155.
18. Campbell J.D. The yield of mild steel under impact loading. J Mech Phys Solids. 3:(1):1954;54-62.
19. Gerard G., Papirno R., Becker H. On experimental solid dynamics. Symposium on Dynamic Behaviour of Materials, ASTM STP 336. 1962;82-103.
20. Bodner SR, Symond PS. Experimental and theoretical investigation of the plastic deformation of cantilever beams subjected to impulsive loading. Trans ASME J App Mech, 1962;
21. Nakamura T. Effects of rate-sensitivity in dynamically loaded 3D fracture specimen. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Fracture, Houston, TX, vol. 1, 1989. p. 795-802.
22. Vargas PM, Dodds RH. Inelastic response of a deep crack single-edge notch specimen under impact loading. Work related to author's Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1993.
23. IC, a measure of fracture toughness. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
24. Wiesner CS. Investigation into temperature and specimen geometry dependence of the 'local approach' parameters of a structural steel. TWI Report, The Welding Institute, UK. August 1995.
25. Ritchie R.O., Knott J.F., Rice J.R. On the relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel. J Mech Phys Solids. 21:1973;395-410.
26. Goldthorpe R., Andrews R.M., Wiesner C.S. Fracture toughness predictions for a range of geometries using a coupled cleavage/ductile micromechanical model. Engineering Structural Integrity Assessment. 1996;TWI, Abington Publishing, Abington, Cambridge.
27. Lidbury D, Sherry A et al. Application of the local approach to predict cleavage and ductile fracture. Advances in fracture mechanics, TAGSY Symposium, Abington, Cambridge, 1996.