Dynamic sound stream formation based on continuity of spectral change

Speech Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 235-259

  Masuda Katsuse, Ikuyo ^a   Kawahara, Hideki ^a  

^a 2 2 Hikaridai Seika cho Soraku gun ^*  (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITION; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

AUDITORY SCENE ANALYSIS; SPEECH SEGREGATION;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

EID: 0032651334     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00084-3     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aikawa, K., Tsuzaki, M., Kawahara, H., 1995. Pitch ringing induced by frequency-modulated tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 98 (5), pt. 2, 2926.
2. Aikawa, K., Kawahara, H., Tsuzaki, M., 1996. A neural matrix model for active tracking of frequency-modulated tones. In: Proceedings of ICSLP96, pp. 578-581.
3. Akagi M., Furui S. Modeling of vowel target prediction mechanism in speech perception (in Japanese). Trans. IEICE Jpn. J69-A:1986;1277-1285.
4. Assmann P.F. The role of formant transitions in the perception of concurrent vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 97(1):1995;575-584.
5. Assmann, P.F., 1996. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Role of formant transitions. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 100 (2), pt. 1, 1141-1152.
6. Assmann P.F., Summerfield Q. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Vowels with different fundamental frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 88(2):1990;680-697.
7. Brady P.T., House A.S., Stevens K.N. Perception of sounds characterized by a rapidly changing resonant frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 33(10):1961;1357-1362.
8. Bregman, A.S., 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis. MIT Press, London.
9. Bregman, A.S., 1993. Auditory scene analysis: hearing in complex environments, In: McAdams, S., Bigand, E. (Eds.), Thinking in Sound. Oxford Science Publications, New York, Chapter 2. pp. 10-36.
10. Brown, G.J., 1992. Computational auditory scene analysis: A representational approach. Research Reports of Department of Computer Science, The University of Sheffield.
11. Brown G.J., Cooke M. Computational auditory scene analysis. Computer Speech and Language. 8:1994;297-336.
12. Cooke, M.P., 1993. Modelling Auditory Processing and Organisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Darwin, C.J., 1991. The relationship between speech perception and the perception of other sounds. In: Matteingly, I.G., Kennedy, M.S. (Eds.), Modularity and the Motor Theory in Speech Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 239-259.
14. 0 difference. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 101 (5), pt. 1, 2839-2847.
15. de Cheveigné, A., 1997b. Concurrent vowel identification. III. A neural model of harmonic interference cancellation. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 101 (5), pt. 1, 2857-2865.
16. de Cheveigné A., McAdams S., Laroche J., Rosenberg M. Identification of concurrent harmonic and inharmonic vowels: A test of the theory of harmonic cancellation and enhancement. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 97(6):1995;3736-3748.
17. Delattre P.C., Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S. Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 27(4):1955;769-773.
18. Divenyi, P.L., Algazi, A.P., 1996. Auditory segregation of simultaneous events based on residue pitch and spectrum. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 100 (4), pt. 2, 2682.
19. Eek, A., Meister, E., 1995. The perception of stop consonants: Locus equations and spectral integration. In: Proc. XIII Internat. Con. Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, Vol. 1, pp. 18-21.
20. Handel, S., 1986. Breaking the acoustic wave into events: Stream segregation. In: Handel, S. (Ed.), Listening: An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events, MIT Press, London, Chapter 7, pp. 185-217.
21. Kawahara, H., 1994. Toward the computational theory of audition (in Japanese). Tech. Rep. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. H-94-63.
22. Kawahara, H., 1997. Speech representation and transformation using adaptive interpolation of weighted spectrum: VOCODER revised. In: Proc. of ICASSP 97, SPCH5P.7, Vol. 2, pp. 1303-1306.
23. Kawahara, H., Masuda-Katsuse, I., de Cheveigné, A., 1997. Restructuring speech representations using STRAIGHT-TEMPO: possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds. In: Working Notes of the Computational Auditory Scene Analysis Workshop, held with 15th Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI'97, pp. 103-112.
24. Klassner, F., Lesser, V., Nawab, H., 1995. The IPUS blackboard architecture as a framework for computational auditory scene analysis. In: Working Notes of the Computational Auditory Scene Analysis Workshop, held with 14th Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI'95, pp. 48-51.
25. Klatt D.H. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 67(3):1980;971-995.
26. Kluender K.R., Jenison R.L. Effects of glide slope, noise intensity, and noise duration on the extrapolation of FM glides through noise. Perception & Psychophysics. 51(3):1992;231-238.
27. Lindblon B.E.F. On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 42(4):1967;830-843.
28. Marr, D., 1982. Vision. W.H. Freeman, New York.
29. Meddis R., Hewitt M.J. Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 91(1):1992;233-245.
30. Nakatani, T., Goto, M., Itoh, T., Okuno, H.G., 1995. Multi-agent based binaural sound stream segregation. In: Working Notes of the Computational Auditory Scene Analysis Workshop, held with 14th Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI'95, pp. 84-99.
31. Pols L.C.W., van Son R.J.J.H. Acoustics and perception of dynamic vowel segments. Speech Communication. 13(1-2):1993;135-147.
32. Repp B.H. Perceptual restoration of a 'missing' speech sound: Auditory induction or illusion? Perception & Psychophysics. 51(1):1992;14-32.
33. Samuel A.G. Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. J. Exp. Psychol.: General. 110(4):1981;474-494.
34. Samuel A.G. The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance. 7(5):1981;1124-1131.
35. Samuel A.G. Lexical uniqueness effects on phonemic restoration. J. Memory and Language. 26:1987;36-56.
36. Strange W., Jenkins J.J., Johnson T.L. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 74(3):1983;695-705.
37. Toyama, K., Lu, J., Nakamura, S., Shikano, K., Kawahara, H., 1997. Subjective test and compression for 4kHz-band-limited STRAIGHT (in Japanese). In: Proc. Fall Meeting, Acoust. Soc. Jpn., pp. 207-208.
38. Warren R.M. Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science. 167:1969;392-393.
39. Warren R.M., Obusek C.J., Ackroff J.M. Auditory induction: Perceptual synthesis of absent sounds. Science. 176:1972;1149-1151.