Learning and performing by exploration: Label quality measured by latent semantic analysis

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 418-425

  Soto, Rodolfo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive models; Label following strategy; Latent semantic analysis; Learning by exploration; Semantic similarity; Usability analysis

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE MODEL; LABEL-FOLLOWING STRATEGY; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; USABILITY ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; WEBSITES; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

SEMANTICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS (LSA); LEARNING BY EXPLORATION;

EID: 0032634968     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/302979.303123     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Rieman, J., et al. (1991). An automated walkthrough. Proceedings of CHI'91 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, pp. 427-428. New York, NY: ACM Press.
2. Poison, P.G., et al. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: A method for theoiy-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(5), 741773.
3. Franzke, M. (1995). Turning research into practice: Characteristics of display-based interaction. Proceedings of CHI'95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 421-428. New York, NY: ACM Press.
4. Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P., and Laham, D. (1998). An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 24, 259-284.
5. Poison, P.G. and Lewis, C.H. (1990). Theoiy-based design for easily learned interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 5(2-3), 191-220.
6. Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Engelbeck, G.E. (1986). Exceptions to generalizations: implications for formal models of human-computer interaction. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
8. Muncher, E. (1989). The acquisition of spreadsheet skills. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
9. Kitajima, M. and Poison, P.G. (1997). LICAI+: A Comprehension-Based Model of Learning for Display- Based Human-Computer Interaction. Proceedings of CHI'97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 333-334. New York, NY: ACM Press.
10. Landauer, T.K., Galotti, K.M., and Hartwell, S. (1983). Natural Command Names and Initial Learning: A study of Text-Editing Terms. Communications of the ACM, 26(1), 495-503.
11. Howes, A. and Young, R.M. (1996). Learning consistent, interactive and meaningful device methods: A computational model. Cognitive Science, 20, 301-356.
12. Rieman, J., Young, R.M., and Howes, A. (1996). A dual-space model of iteratively deepening exploratory learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44(6), 743-775.
13. Rieman, J.F. (1994). Learning Strategies and Exploratory Behavior of Interactive Computer Users. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
14. Kitajima, M. and Poison, P.G. (1997). A Comprehension-Based Model of Exploration. Human- Computer Interaction, 12, 439-462.
15. Kitajima, M., Soto, R., and Poison, P.G. (1998). LICAI+: A Comprehension-Based Model of The Recall of Action Sequences. In F. Ritter and R.M. Young (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Cognitive Modelling (Nottingham, April 1-4, 1998) (pp. 82-89). Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press.
16. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17. Mannes, S.M. and Kintsch, W. (1991). Routine Computing Tasks: Planning as Understanding. Cognitive Science, 15, 305-342.
18. Deerwester, S., et al. (1990). Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society For Information Science, 41(6), 391-407.
19. Landauer, T.K. and Dumais, S.T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211-240.
20. Landauer, T.K. and Dumais, S.T. (1996). How come you know so much? From practical problem to theory. In D. Hermann, et al. (Eds.), Basic and applied memory: Memory in context (pp. 105-126). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Landauer, T.K. and Dumais, S.T. (1994). Latent semantic analysis and the measurement of knowledge. In R.M. Kaplan and J.C. Burstein (Eds.), Educational testing service conference on natural language processing techniques and technology in assessment and education . Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
22. Ericsson, A.K. and Simon, H.A. (1980). Verbal Reports as Data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215-251.
23. Payne, S.J. (1991). Display-based action at the user interface. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35, 275-289.
24. Nielsen, J. (1992). Applying Heuristic Evaluation to a Highly Domain-Specific User Interface. Technical memorandum. Morristown, NJ: Bellcore.
25. Soto, R. (1998). Learning and Performing by Exploration: Label Quality Measured by Latent Semantic Analysis. Unpublished master thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.