Towards an evaluative framework for software process improvement models

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 139-148

  Saiedian, Hossein ^a   Chennupati, Kalyani ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^b 4000 McEwan Road South Suite 200   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT MODELS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0032630379     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0164-1212(99)00034-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brodman, J.G., Johnson, D.L., 1996. Return on investment from software process improvement as measured by US industry. Crosstalk, pp. 23-29.
2. Bush, M., 1991. Process assessments in NASA. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 299-304.
3. Butler K.L. The economic benefits of software process improvement. Crosstalk. 8(7):1995;14-17.
4. Cheek M. Using feedback to improve software development. IEEE Software. 12(3):1995;89-90.
5. Coallier, F., 1995. Trillium: A model for the assessment of telecom product development and support capability. Software Process Newsletter 2 (1), SPN3-SPN8.
6. Coletta, A., 1995. The SPICE project: An international standard for software process assessment, improvement and capability determination. In: Second Symposium on Software Quality Techniques and Acquisition Criteria, pp. 49-64.
7. DeMarco, T., 1982. Controlling Software Projects. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8. Dewey, R.H., 1988. Software engineering technology and management. SPI International, Business Intelligence Program, Report No. 762.
9. Dion R. Elements of a process improvement program. IEEE Software. 9(4):1992;83-85.
10. El-Emam, K., Drouin, J., Melo, W., 1998. SPICE: The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. IEEE-CS, Silver Spring, MD.
11. Fenton, N.E., 1991. Software Metrics: A Rigorous Approach. Chapman & Hall, London.
12. Goldenson, D.R., Herbsleb, J.D., 1995. After the appraisal: A systematic survey of process improvement, its benefits and factors that inuence success. Technical Report CMU/SEI-95-TR-009, Software Engineering Institute.
13. Herbsleb, J., Carleton, A., Rozum, J., Siegel, J., Zubrow, D., 1994. Benefits of CMM-based software process improvement: Initial results. Technical Report SEI-94-TR-13, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
14. Humphrey, W., 1989. Managing the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK.
15. Humphrey, W., 1992. Introduction to software process improvement. Technical Report CMU/SEI-92-TR-7, Software Engineering Institute.
16. Humphrey, W., Kitson, D., Kasse, T., 1989. The state of software engineering practice: A preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 277-288.
17. Jones, C., 1992. Critical problems in software measurement, Version 1.00, Burlington, Mass.: Software Productivity Research (SPR).
18. Jones, C., 1996. The pragmatics of software process improvement. Software Process Newsletter 3 (5), SPN1-SPN4.
19. Kehoe, R., Jarvis, A., 1996. ISO 9000-3: A Tool for Software Product and Process Improvement. Springer, New York, NY.
20. Kitson, D., Humphrey, W.S., 1989. The role of assessment in software process improvement. Technical Report CMU/SEI-89-TR-3, Software Engineering Institute.
21. Koltun, P., 1992. Software process assessment: A first step to improvement. In Proceedings of the International Software Quality Exchange, Juran Institute, pp. 4B-31-4B39.
22. Kuvaja, P., Simila, J., Kranik, L., Bicego, A., Saukkonen, S., Koch, G., 1994. Software Process Assessment and Improvement: The Bootstrap Approach. Blackwell, Oxford.
23. Lebsanft, E., 1996. BOOTSTRAP: Experiences with Europe's software process assessment and improvement method. Software Process Newsletter 3(5), SPN6-SPN10.
24. Paulish D.J., Carleton A.D. Case studies of software-process-improvement measurement. IEEE Computer, Silver Spring, MD. 27(9):1994;50-57.
25. Paulk, M., Weber, C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M., 1995. The Capability Maturity Model. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK.
26. Pulford, K., Kuntzmann-Combelles, A., Shirlaw, S. A., 1995. Quantitative Approach to software Management: The AMI Handbook. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK.
27. Zaharan, S., 1998. Software Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK.