The evolution of the US energy service company (ESCO) industry: From ESCO to Super ESCO

Energy

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 479-492

  Vine, E ^a   Nakagami, H ^b   Murakoshi, C ^b  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Jyukankyo Research Institute Inc   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

ENERGY SERVICE COMPANIES;

ELECTRIC UTILITIES;

EID: 0032624494     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(99)00009-2     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Dayton D, Goldman C, Pickle S. The energy services company (ESCO) industry: analysis of industry and market trends. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACEEE Summer Study, vol. 6. Washington (DC): American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1998:29-45.
2. Fraser M, Montross C. Energy service companies: the sky's the limit! In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACEEE Summer Study, vol. 6. Washington (DC): American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1998:47-54.
3. Goldman C, Dayton D. Future prospects for ESCOs in a restructured electricity industry. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACEEE Summer Study, vol. 10. Washington (DC): American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1996:59-69.
4. LeBlanc W. Energy service marketing: ESM supplants DSM. Public Utilities Fortnightly. 133(13):1995;20-24.
5. Newcomb J. The future of energy efficiency services in a competitive environment, Boulder (CO): E Source, 1994.
6. Shippee G. The future for energy service companies: changes and trends. Electricity Journal. 9(6):1996;80-84.
7. Cudahy M, Dreessen T. A review of the ESCO industry in the United States. Washington (DC): National Association of Energy Service Companies, 1996.
8. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Electricity prices in a competitive environment: marginal cost pricing of generation services and financial status of electric utilities. A preliminary analysis through 2015. Report DOE/EIA-0614. Washington (DC): US Department of Energy, 1997.
9. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Opinion adopting standards of conduct governing relationships between utilities and their affiliates. Decision D.97-12-088. San Francisco (CA): California Public Utilities Commission, 1997.