Guaranteed computable bounds for the exact error in the finite element solution. Part I: One-dimensional model problem

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 176, Issue 1-4, 1999, Pages 51-79

  Babuska I ^a   Strouboulis, T ^b   Gangaraj, S K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Texas AandM University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ERROR ESTIMATION;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 0032624206     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00330-8     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. [1] I. Babuška, T. Strouboulis, C.S. Upadhyay, S.K. Gangaraj and K. Copps, Validation of a posteriori error estimators by numerical approach, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 37 (1994) 1073-1123.
2. [2] B.A. Szabo and I. Babuška, Finite Element Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991).
3. [3] I. Babuška and T. Strouboulis, The Finite Element Method and its Reliability (Oxford University Press) in preparation.
4. [4] I. Babuška, T. Strouboulis, C.S. Upadhyay and S.K. Gangaraj, A model study of element residual estimators for linear elliptic problems: The quality of the estimators in the interior of meshes of triangles and quadrilaterals, Comput. Struct. 57 (1995) 1009-1028.
5. [5] I. Babuška, T. Strouboulis and C.S. Upadhyay, A model study of the quality of a-posteriori error estimators for linear elliptic problems. Error estimation in the interior of patchwise uniform grids of triangles, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 114 (1994) 307-378.
6. [6] I. Babuška, T. Strouboulis and C.S. Upadhyay, A model study of the quality of a-posteriori error estimators for finite element solutions of linear elliptic problems, with particular reference to the behavior near the boundary, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 40 (1997) 2521-2577.
7. [7] P. Ladeveze and D. Leguillon, Error estimate procedure in the finite element method and applications, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 20(3) (1983) 485-509.
8. [8] M. Ainsworth and J.T. Oden, A-posteriori error estimation in finite element analysis, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.: Comput. Mech. Adv. 142 (1997) 1-88.
9. [9] J.T. Oden, L. Demkowicz, W. Rachowicz and T.A. Westermann, Toward a universal h-p adaptive finite element strategy, Part 2. A posteriori error estimation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 77 (1989) 113-180.
10. [10] M. Paraschivoiu, J. Peraire and A.T. Patera, A-posteriori finite element bounds for linear functional outputs of elliptic partial differential equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 150 (1997) 289-312.
11. [11] M. Paraschivoiu and A.T. Patera, A hierarchical duality approach to bounds for the bounds of partial differential equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 158 (1998) 389-407.
12. [12] I. Babuška and A. Miller, The post-processing approach in the finite element method - Part 1: Calculation of displacements, stress and other higher derivatives of displacement, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 20 (1984) 1085-1109.
13. [13] I. Babuška and A. Miller, The post-processing approach in the finite element method - Part 3: A-posteriori error estimates and adaptive mesh selection, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 20 (1984) 2311-2324.
14. [14] T. Strouboulis, S.K. Gangaraj and I. Babuška, Guaranteed computable bounds for the exact error in the finite element solution - Part II: Two dimensional model problem, in preparation.