Encoding categorical and coordinate spatial relations without input-output correlations: New simulation models

Cognitive Science

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 33-51

  Baker, David P ^a   Chabris, Christopher F ^a   Kosslyn, Stephen M ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032622992     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2301_2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Breitmeyer, B. B., & Williams, M. C. (1990). Effects of isoluminant-background color on metacontrast and stroboscopic motion: Interactions between sustained (P) and transient (M) channels. Vision Research, 30, 1069-1075.
2. Cook, N. D. (1995). Correlations between input and output units in neural networks. Cognitive Science, 19, 563-574.
3. Cook, N. D., Früh, H., & Landis, T. (1995). The cerebral hemispheres and neural network simulations: Design considerations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 410-422.
4. Cowin, E. L., & Hellige, J. B. (1994). Categorical versus coordinate spatial processing: Effects of blurring and hemispheric asymmetry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 156-164.
5. Cureton, E. E. (1959). Note on Phi/PhiMax. Psychometrika, 24, 89-91.
6. Dreher, B., Fukuda, Y., & Rodieck, R. W. (1976). Identification, classification, and anatomical segregation of cells with X-like and Y-like properties in the lateral geniculate nucleus of old-world primates. Journal of Physiology (London), 258, 433-452.
7. Hellige, J. B., & Michimata, C. (1989). Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory & Cognition, 17, 770-776.
8. Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol.1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Jacobs, R. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Encoding shape and spatial relations: The role of receptive field size in coordinating complementary representations. Cognitive Science, 18, 361-386.
10. Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148-175.
11. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Kosslyn, S. M., Chabris, C. F., & Baker, D. P. (1995). Neural network models as evidence for different types of visual representations. Cognitive Science, 19, 575-579.
13. Kosslyn, S. M., Chabris, C. F., Marsolek, C. J., Jacobs, R. A., & Koenig, O. (1995). On computational evidence for different types of spatial relations encoding: Reply to Cook et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 423-431.
14. Kosslyn, S. M., Chabris, C. F., Marsolek, C. J., & Koenig, O. (1992). Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: Computational analyses and computer simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 562-577.
15. Kosslyn, S. M., Anderson, A. K., Hillger, L. A., & Hamilton, S. E. (1994). Hemispheric differences in sizes of receptive fields or attentional biases? Neuropsychology, 8, 139-147.
16. Kosslyn, S. M., Koenig, O., Barrett, A., Cave, C. B., Tang, J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 723-735.
17. Kosslyn, S.M., Sokolov, M.A., & Chen, J.C. (1989). The lateralization of BRIAN: A computational theory and model of visual himispheric specialization. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert Simon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Roth, E. C., & Hellige, J. B. (1998). Spatial processing and hemispheric asymmetry: Contributions of the transient/magnocellular visual system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 472-484.
19. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol.1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). PDP models and general issues in cognitive science. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol.1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Rybash, J.M., & Hoyer, W.J. (1992). Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: A reappraisal. Memory & Cognition, 20, 271-276.
23. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), The Analysis of Visual Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.