Categorical perception as a function of stimulus quality

Phonetica

Volumn 56, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 56-72

  Van Hessen, A J ^a   Schouten, M E H ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032618380     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000028441     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cutting, J.E.: Plucks and bows are categorically perceived, sometimes. Percept. Psychophys. 31: 462-476 (1982).
2. Hessen, A.J. van: Discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar speech sounds; doct. diss. Utrecht University (1992).
3. Hessen, A.J. van; Scheuten, M.E.H.: Modeling phoneme perception. II. A model of stop consonant discrimination. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 92: 1856-1868 (1992).
4. Lane, H.: The motor theory of speech perception, a critical review. Psychol. Rev. 72: 275-309 (1965).
5. Liberman, A.M.; Harris, K.S.; Hoffman, H.S.; Griffith, B.C.: The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J. exp. Psychol. 54: 358-368 (1957).
6. Macmillan, N.A.; Braida, L.D.; Goldberg, R.F.: Central and peripheral processes in the perception of speech and nonspeech sounds; in Scheuten, The psychophysics of speech perception, pp. 28-45 (Nijhoff, The Hague 1987).
7. Macmillan, N.A.; Creelman, C.D.: Detection theory: a user's guide (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991).
8. Macmillan, N.A.; Goldberg, R.F.; Braida, L.D.: Resolution for speech sounds: basic sensitivity and context memory on vowel and consonant continua. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 84: 1262-1280 (1988).
9. Macmillan, N.A.; Kaplan, A.L.; Creelman, C.D.: The psychophysics of categorical perception. Psychol. Rev. 84: 452-471 (1977).
10. Massaro, D.W.: Categorical partition: a fuzzy-logical model of categorization behavior; in Harnad, Categorical perception, pp. 254-283 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1987).
11. Schouten, M.E.H.: The case against a speech mode of perception. Acta psychol. 44: 71-98 (1980).
12. Schouten, M.E.H. ; Hessen, A.J. van: Modeling phoneme perception. I. Categorical perception. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 92: 1841-1855 (1992a).
13. Schouten, M.E.H.; Hessen, A.J. van: Different discrimination strategies for vowels and consonants; in Schouten, The auditory processing of speech: from sounds to words, pp. 309-314 (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 1992b).
14. Studdert-Kennedy, M.; Liberman, A.M.; Harris, K.S.; Cooper, F.S.: The motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane's critical review. Psychol. Rev. 77: 234-249 (1970).