Agreement and clinical utility of 2 techniques for measuring cardiac output in patients with low cardiac output

American Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 464-474

  Albert, Nancy M ^a,b   Spear, Brenda T ^a   Hammel, Jeff ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FORWARD HEART FAILURE; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING; PHYSIOLOGY; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWAN GANZ CATHETER; THERMODILUTION;

CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC OUTPUT, LOW; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; CRITICAL CARE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 0032616915     PISSN: 10623264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc1999.8.1.464     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hollenberg SM, Hoyt J. Pulmonary artery catheters in cardiovascular disease. New Horiz. 1997;5:207-213.
2. Yelderman ML. Continuous measurement of cardiac output with the use of stochastic system identification techniques. J Clin Monit. 1991;6:322-332.
3. Sommers MS, Woods SL, Courtade MA. Issues in methods and measurement of thermodilution cardiac output. Nurs Res. 1993;42:228-233.
4. Kalassian KG, Raffin TA. The technique of thermodilution cardiac output measurement. J Crit Illness. 1996;11:249-256.
5. Ramsay JG. Continuous cardiac output: myth or reality? Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:98-102.
6. Gillman PH. Continuous measurement of cardiac output: a milestone in hemodynamic monitoring. Focus Crit Care. 1992;19:155-158.
7. Munro HM, Wood CE, Taylor BL, Smith GB. Continuous invasive cardiac output monitoring: the Baxter/Edwards critical care Swan-Ganz® IntellicathTM and VigilanceTM system. Clin Intensive Care. 1994;5:52-55.
8. Hogue CW, Rosenbloom M, McCawley C, Lappa DG. Comparison of cardiac output measurement by continuous thermodilution with electromagnetometry in adult cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1994;8:631-635.
9. Yelderman ML, Ramsay MA, Quinn MD, Paulsen AW, McKnow RC, Gillman PH. Continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurements in intensive care unit patients. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth. 1992;6:270-274.
10. Boldt J, Menges T, Wollbruck M, Hammermann H, Hempelmann G. Is continuous cardiac output measurement using thermodilution reliable in the critically ill patient? Crit Care Med. 1994;22:1913-1918.
11. Ditmyer CE, Shively M, Burns DB, Reichman RT. Comparison of continuous with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Am J Crit Care. 1995;4:460-465.
12. Burchell SA, Yu M, Takiguchi SA, Ohta RM, Myers SA. Evaluation of a continuous cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation catheter in critically ill surgical patients. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:388-391.
13. Tulzo YL, Belghith M, Sequin P, et al. Reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output determination in critically ill patients: comparison between bolus and continuous methods. J Clin Monit. 1996;12:379-385.
14. Luchette F, Johannigman J, Brason R, Porembka D, Davis K Jr. Effects of body temperature on accuracy of continuous cardiac output measurements[abstract]. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:A137.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
16. McCullagh P, Neider JA. Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman & Hall; 1983.