Maintaining client safety and scientific integrity in research with battered women

Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 89-93

  Lutz, Kristin F ^a,b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Abuse; Ethics; Scientific integrity

Indexed keywords

BATTERED WOMAN; FEMALE; HUMAN; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SAFETY; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STANDARD;

BATTERED WOMEN; FEMALE; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH; SAFETY; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 0032615888     PISSN: 15276546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1999.tb00427.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (1993). Ethical issues in self-censorship: Ethnographic research on sensitive topics. In C.M. Renzetti & R.M. Lee (Eds.), Researching sensitive topics (249-266). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Alberts, B., & Shine, K. (1994). Scientists and the integrity of research. Science, 266, 1660-1661.
3. Anderson, D.G. (1996). Homeless women's perceptions about their families of origin. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 18, 29-42.
4. Bergen, R.K. (1993). Interviewing survivors of marital rape: Doing feminist research on sensitive topics. In C.M. Renzetti & R.M. Lee (Eds.), Researching sensitive topics (197-211). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Blanck, P.D., Bellack, A.S., Rosnow, R.L., Rotheram-Borus, M.J., & Schooler, N.R. (1992). Scientific rewards and conflicts of ethical choices in human subjects research. American Psychologist, 47, 959-965.
6. Brannen, J. (1988). Research note: The study of sensitive subjects. The Sociological Review, 36, 552-563.
7. Chop, R.M., & Silva, M.C. (1991). Scientific fraud: Definitions, policies, and implications for nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 7, 166-171.
8. Commission on Research Integrity. (1995). Integrity and misconduct in research (Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] Publication No: 1996-746-425). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. (1995). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Cowles, K.V. (1988). Issues in qualitative research on sensitive topics. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10, 163-17.
11. Denham, S.A. (1993). Stemming the tide of disreputable science: Implications for nursing. Nursing Forum, 28(2), 11-18.
12. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Eby, K.K., Rumptz, M.H., & Sullivan, C.M. (In Press). The intersection of feminist values, methodologies, and community psychology: A social action program for women with abusive partners. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan State University.
14. Gelles, R.J. (1978). Methods for studying sensitive family topics. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48, 408-424.
15. Hawley, D.J., & Jeffers, J.M. (1992). Scientific misconduct as a dilemma for nursing. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 24, 51-55.
16. Ketefian, S., & Lenz, E.R. (1995). Promoting scientific integrity in nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11, 263-269.
17. Lee, R.M., & Renzetti, C.M. (1993). The problems of researching sensitive topics: An overview and introduction. In C.M. Renzetti & R.M. Lee (Eds.), Researching sensitive topics (3-13). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Macrina, F.L. (1995). Scientific integrity: An introductory text with cases. Washington, DC: ASM Press.
19. Melton, G.B. (1990). Certificates of confidentiality under the Public Health Service Act: Strong protection but not enough. Violence and Victims, 5, 67-71.
20. Palca, J. (1996). Scientific misconduct: Ill-defined, redefined. Hastings Center Report, 26(5), 4.
21. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research & the Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. (1992). Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22. Parker, B., Ulrich, Y., & Nursing Research Consortium on Violence and Abuse. (1990). A protocol of safety: Research on abuse of women. Nursing Research, 39, 248-250.
23. Platzer, H., & James, T. (1997). Methodological issues conducting sensitive research on lesbian and gay men's experience of nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 626-633.
24. Polit, D.F., & Hungler, B.P. (1995). Nursing research: Principles and methods (5th ed.). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co.
25. Punch, M. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 83-97). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Ramos, M.C. (1989). Some ethical implications of qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 12, 57-63.
27. Rankin, M., & Esteves, M.D. (1997). Perceptions of scientific misconduct in nursing. Nursing Research, 46, 270-276.
28. Renzetti, C.M., & Lee, R.M. (Eds.). (1993). Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Rodgers, B.L., & Cowles, K.V. (1993). The qualitative research audit trail: A complex collection of documentation. Research in Nursing and Health, 16, 219-226.
30. Rumptz, M.H., Sullivan, C.M., Davidson, W.S., & Basta, J. (1991). An ecological approach to tracking battered women over time. Violence and Victims, 6, 237-244.
31. Schachman, H.K. (1993). What is misconduct in science? Science, 261, 148-149, 183.
32. Sieber, J.E. (1993). The ethics and politics of sensitive research. In C.M. Renzetti & R.M. Lee (Eds.), Researching sensitive topics (14-26). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Sieber, J.E., & Stanley, B. (1988). Ethical and professional dimensions of socially sensitive research. American Psychologist, 43, 49-55.
34. Silva, M. (1995). Ethical guidelines in the conduct, dissemination, and implementation of nursing research. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association.
35. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1995a, January 20). Findings of scientific misconduct. Federal Register, 60, 4169.
36. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1995b, February 27). Findings of scientific misconduct. Federal Register, 60, 10558-10589.
37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1995c, June 22). Findings of scientific misconduct. Federal Register, 60, 32555-32556.
38. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1996a, March 14). Findings of scientific misconduct. Federal Register, 61, 10584-10585.
39. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (1996b, April 22). Findings of scientific misconduct. Federal Register, 61, 17705.
40. Wocial, L.D. (1995). The role of mentors in promoting integrity and preventing scientific misconduct in nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(5), 276-280.