Comparison of recoil-induced resonances and the collective atomic recoil laser

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 585-596

  Berman, P R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; LASERS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PROBES; QUANTUM THEORY; VECTORS;

ATOMIC DENSITY; COLLECTIVE ATOMIC RECOIL LASER; RECOIL INDUCED RESONANCES;

ELECTRON RESONANCE;

EID: 0032614906     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.585     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J. Guo, P. R. Berman, B. Dubetsky, and P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1426 (1992).
2. J. Guo and P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 47, 4128 (1993)
3. Phys. Rev. AJ. Guo, 49, 3934 (1994)
4. Phys. Rev. AJ. Guo51, 2338 (1995).
5. P. R. Berman, B. Dubetsky, and J. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 51, 3947 (1995).
6. B. Dubetsky and P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2519 (1995).
7. J. Y. Courtois, G. Grynberg, B. Lounis, and P. Verkerk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3017 (1994).
8. S. Guibal, C. Triché, L. Guidoni, P. Verkerk, and G. Grynberg, Opt. Commun. 131, 61 (1996).
9. D. R. Meacher, D. Boiron, H. Metcalf, C. Saloman, and G. Grynberg, Phys. Rev. A 50, R1992 (1994).
10. M. Kozuma, Y. Imai, N. Nakagawa, and M. Ohtsu, Phys. Rev. A 52, R3421 (1995)
11. M. Kozuma, N. Nakagawa, W. Jhe, and M. Ohtsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2428 (1996).
12. M. G. Raizen, J. Koga, B. Sundaram, Y. Kishimoto, H. Takuma, and T. Tajima (unpublished).
13. R. Bonifacio and L. De Salvo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 341, 360 (1994)
14. R. Bonifacio, L. De Salvo, L. M. Narducci, and E. J. D’Angelo, Phys. Rev. A 50, 1716 (1994)
15. R. Bonifacio and L. De Salvo, Opt. Commun. 115, 505 (1995)
16. L. De Salvo, R. Cannerozzi, R. Bonifacio, E. J. D’Angelo, and L. M. Narducci, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2342 (1995);R. Bonifacio, L. De Salvo, L. M. Narducci, and E. J. D’Angelo (unpublished).
17. R. Bonifacio and P. Verkerk, Opt. Commun. 124, 469 (1996).
18. Propagation effects have been included in the paper of Bonifacio et al., R. Bonifacio, G. R. M. Robb, and B. W. J. McNeil, Phys. Rev. A 56, 912 (1997).
19. M. G. Moore and P. Meystre, Phys. Rev A 58, 3248 (1998).
20. B. R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. A 5, 2217 (1972)
21. F. Y. Wu, S. Ezekiel, M. Ducloy, and B. R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1077 (1977).
22. The linewidth actually results from the convolution of a Lorentzian having width equal to the excited-state decay rate (Formula presented) and a Gaussian having width (Formula presented) where q is the magnitude of the difference of pump and probe field wave vectors and u is the most probable atomic speed.
23. G. Grynberg and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Opt. Commun. 96, 150 (1993).
24. G. Khitrova, P. R. Berman, and M. Sargent, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 160 (1988).
25. B. Dubetsky and P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 47, 1294 (1993).
26. The finite quantization volume for the center-of-mass motion implies that one should replace (Formula presented) by (Formula presented) whenever it appears. This prescription gives an initial density (Formula presented)
27. G. L. Lippi, G. P. Barozzi, S. Barbay, and J. R. Tredicce, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2452 (1996).
28. P. R. Hemmer, N. P. Bigelow, D. P. Katz, M. S. Shahriar, L. De Salvo, and R. Bonifacio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1468 (1996).
29. W. J. Brown, J. R. Gardner, D. J. Gauthier, and R. Vilaseca, Phys. Rev. A 55, R1601 (1997).