Digital teledermatology for skin tumours: A preliminary assessment using a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 5, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1999, Pages 57-58

  Lewis, K ^a   Gilmour, E ^b   Harrison, P V ^c   Patefield, S ^a   Dickinson, Y ^c   Manning, D ^a   Griffiths, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

^b HOPE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL LANCASTER INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METHODOLOGY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN TUMOR; TELEMETRY; TELEPATHOLOGY;

DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN NEOPLASMS; TELEMETRY; TELEPATHOLOGY;

EID: 0032613657     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/1357633991932568     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Thomas JD. Recent progress in digital image formatting and current trends in computers: their role in digital image storage and telemedicine. Current Opinion in Cardiology 1995;10:615-18
2. Brown S. Digital imaging in clinical photography. Part 2. Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine 1994;17:105-10
3. Cook J. ISDN in dentistry: using videoconferencing and dataconferencing for remote diagnoses and tutorials in orthodontics. Health Informatics Journal 1997;3:106-7
4. Schiff T, Stiller MJ. Photography without film: low-cost digital cameras come of age in dermatology. International Journal of Dermatology 1994;33:113-15
5. Taylor P. A survey of research in telemedicine. 1: Telemedicine systems. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1998;4:1-17
6. Stoecker WV, Moss RH. Editorial: Digital imaging in dermatology. Computerised Medical Imaging and Graphics 1992;16:145-50
7. Zelickson BD, Homan L. Teledermatology in the nursing home. Archives of Dermatology 1997;133:171-4
8. Harrison PV, Kirby B, Dickinson Y, Schofield R. Teledermatology-high technology or not? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1998;4 (suppl. 1):31-2
9. Gilmour E, Campbell SM, Loane MA, et al. Comparison of teleconsultations and face-to-face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study. British Journal of Dermatology 1998;139:81-7
10. Norton SA, Burdick AE, Phillips CM, Berman B. Teledermatology and underserved populations. Archives of Dermatology 1997;133:197-200
11. Phillips CM, Burke WA, Allen MH, Stone D, Wilson JL. Reliability of telemedicine in evaluating skin tumours. Telemedicine Journal 1998;4:5-9
12. Lowitt MH, Kessler II, Kauffman L, Hooper FJ, Siegel E, Burnett JW. Teledermatology and in-person examinations. Archives of Dermatology 1998;134:471-6