The Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. Reliability and validity

Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, Supplement

Volumn 28, Issue 111, 1999, Pages 10-16

  Waldner, A ^a   Cronstedt, H ^a   Stenstrom C H ^b  

^a DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Arthritis; Disease activity; Fatigue; Pain; Physiotherapy; Questionnaire; Sensitivity to change

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SWEDEN; VALIDATION PROCESS; CLASSIFICATION; EXERCISE; HOSPITALIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPONDYLITIS, ANKYLOSING; SWEDEN;

EID: 0032613232     PISSN: 03013847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ammer K. Physiotherapy in seronegative spondylarthropathies - a systematic review. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil 1997;7:114-9.
2. Moll J, Wright V. Normal range of spinal mobility. An objective clinical study. Ann Rheum Dis 1971;30:381-6.
3. Moffett J, Hughes I, Griffiths P. Measurement of cervical spine movements using a simple inclinometer. Physiother 1989;75:309-12.
4. Nordemar R, Törner C. Treatment of acute cervical pain - a comparative group study. Pain 1981;10:93-101.
5. Åstrand O, Rodahl K: Textbook of work physiology. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1970S.
6. Hidding A, de Wine L, van der Linden S. Determinants of self-reported health status in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1994;21:275-8.
7. Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: Developement and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981;19:787-805.
8. Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis. The Arthritis Impact Measurement scales. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:146-52.
9. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137-45.
10. Daltroy L, Larson M, Roberts WN, Liang M. A modification of the Health Assessement Questionnaire for the spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol 1990;17:946-50.
11. Abbott CA, Helliwell PS, Chamberlain MA. Functional assessement in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of a new self-administered questionnaire and correlation with anthropometric variables. Br J Rheumatol 1994;33:1060-6.
12. Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nakache J-P, Nguyen M, Mery C et al. Evaluation of a functional index and an articular index in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1988;15:302-7.
13. Calin A. The individual with ankylosing spondylitis: defining disease status and the impact of the illness. Br J Rheumatol 1995;34:663-72.
14. Kennedy L, Jenkinson T, Mallorie P, Whitelock H, Garrett S et al. Ankylosing spondylitis: the correlation between a new metrology score and radiology. Br J Rheumatol 1995;34:767-70.
15. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P et al. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2286-91.
16. Claudepierre P, Sibilia J, Goupille P, Flipo R-M, Wendling D et al. Evaluation of a Frensh version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index in patients with spondyloarthropathy. J Rheumatol 1997;24:1954-8.
17. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York Criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361-8.
18. Jenkinson T, Mallorie P, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, Garrett S et al. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis. The Bath A S Metrology Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:1694-8.
19. Moll J, Wright V. New York clinikal criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A statistical evaluation. Ann Rheum Dis 1973;32:354-63.
20. Whitelock H. Bath. Personal communication, 1997.
21. American Academie of Ortopedic Surgeons: Joint Motion. Method of measuring and recording. Churchill Livingstone. Edinburgh 1966.
22. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O'Hea J et al. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: The developement of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2281-5.
23. Jones S, Steiner A, Garrett L, Calin A. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G). Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:66-71.
24. Currier DP. Elements of research in physical therapy - 3rd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1990.
25. Joyce C, Zutsni D, Hrubes V, Mason R. Comparision of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Europ J Clin Pharmacol 1975;8:415-20.
26. Chapman CR, Casey KL, Dubner R, Foley KM, Gracely RH et al. Pain measurement: an overview. Pain 1985;22:1-31.
27. Harms-Ringdahl K. On assessment of Shoulder Exercise and Load-Elicited Pain in Cervical Spine. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell Periodical Company, 1986.
28. Edmonds JP. Fifth joint World Health Organization and International League of Associations for Rheumatology task force meeting on rheumatic disease. J Rheumatol 1994;21 Suppl. 41:1-89.
29. Jones S, Calin A, Steiner A. An update on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity and Functional Indices (BASDAI. BASFI): Excellent Cronbach's Alpha scores. J Rheumatol 1996;23:407.
30. Heijde D, Bellamy N, Calin A, Dougados M, Asim Khan M et al. Preliminary core sets for endpoints in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1997;24:2225-9.